Guys and Gals, my son is 20 and has been driving for 3 years now. However, due to him hitting something in the road and wrecking a wheel/tyre/shock absorber that cost me £650 just before xmas , I have now taken an interest in the breakdown cover. They argued that the event, hitting an object laying in the road, was not a breakdown and although they did recover his car, they made sure he realised that they did not need to do so. The reason they did was solely down to the good nature of the breakdown driver who felt the situation was unsafe; it was 23:00, raining and he was on the A31 near Guildford which is a fast road.
Notwithstanding they are probably correct and that the small print says the same, it got me thinking about the following situations and how the breakdown companies deal with them.
1. Accidents - I now assume that in the event of an accident whereby the car was not drivable, they would not recover the vehicle.
2. Flat tyres - My sons car has a tube of 'gunk' and a tyre inflator but should the tyre not be temporarily fixable using this process, and the car needs recovery, they would not be required to recover it.
The question arises, therefore, as to what you would do in these situations and is there such a thing as a non-breakdown recovery policy?
Notwithstanding they are probably correct and that the small print says the same, it got me thinking about the following situations and how the breakdown companies deal with them.
1. Accidents - I now assume that in the event of an accident whereby the car was not drivable, they would not recover the vehicle.
2. Flat tyres - My sons car has a tube of 'gunk' and a tyre inflator but should the tyre not be temporarily fixable using this process, and the car needs recovery, they would not be required to recover it.
The question arises, therefore, as to what you would do in these situations and is there such a thing as a non-breakdown recovery policy?