-
-
KOh, I knew before I bought it; 241g/km. I had to have this one, though; Tanzanite blue, pale beige leather, matching half-wood...
-
KI don’t think all CLKs post 2006 would be affected - some of the 231bhp 3.0L 280s are showing £395 PA (224g/km CO2)
-
KIt’s looking like a good time to move on. It sounds as though the car has been neglected, and unless you can DIY the work it wouldn’t...
-
KLot to be said for better the devil you know with cars. For example your CLK being a 2005 model means it avoids the ludicrous April 2006...
-
KPre March 2006 is still £415!.....but that's better than the new top rate of £735 I guess! :(
-
Kkenam replied to the thread Think I am about to scrap 2005 CLK 320.yeah I cant DIY the repairs and I have a lot on at the moment, so even if I could, little time.. What next - currently my criteria is...
-
Kkenam replied to the thread Think I am about to scrap 2005 CLK 320.yikes didnt realise tav was up that much!
-
Kkenam replied to the thread Think I am about to scrap 2005 CLK 320.oh lovely too! My body work looks great tbh - people are surprised its coming up on 20 years, especially given the inside as well...
-
KHow old and how many miles?.....but yes its not sounding good.
-
KI hate to throw the towel in on cars but I would on this one. You may end up spending more on it than buying a replacement. JMO.
-
Kkenam replied to the thread Think I am about to scrap 2005 CLK 320.Built 2004, registered 2005 about 120k miles on.. Yeah I think its time for the inevitable.. love that engine on it too and a shame as...
-
KHave a CLK320 That I bought almost 3 years back but its got a few issues and I think I am about to (heartbreakingly) scrap - maybe just...
-
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
