Separate names with a comma.
I would go Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 for 18" wheels. It's superb in the wet and still good in the dry. There's relatively little difference in dry...
Sounds the same as all the rest surely?
I'd love one like this...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
How about no.
I have an estate and it's not worth sinking £10k+ into it for the BS body conversion. However, a nice bumper with no DRLs and...
Never mind the sound, I want that bumper so it gets rid of the awful DRLs.
It's not described as 4matic on the configurator, it's just a website mistake.
The more time I spend driving these days the more I crave supreme luxury and comfort (albeit still with a fast engine) because everyone just...
Why E for 63 and C for 43?
The non S cars are notably cheaper. Few differences like less power and smaller brakes but still an epic car.
^ Agree with this. ^
I went Wavetrac and having had a Quaife before I'd say it is marginally better but both are good.
Mentions some low level stuff like A35 but misses the 204 C63 or 212 E63. I don't get it when it's entitled the greatest AMG cars.
The question is, what's still on the list to do...?
Fair enough Pete.
I got mine for £400 and I immediately felt the difference so I didn't feel the need for dyno as the actual power is somewhat...
Not necessarily. A car mapped as often as a C63 doesn't need a dyno. The map has already been refined over many cars and unless you have non stock...
More like double that... :)
In my 204 C63 the onboard computer is 1mpg too optimistic.