Originally Posted by MangoMan
Albeit a silly thing to try to accomplish, I think the following statement by the arresting officer all-together slightly harsh, if not downright insulting!
---"Mr Aziz was fully aware of his disabilities and we find the driver was in a dangerous, defective...
My head gasket on my old 300sl 24 v failed after about 6 months of leaking with no real visible evidence of lack of power etc a bit of overheating though.
In the end it cost me a whopping £2000 as my head cracked and had to be welded.
I would not risk a long journey if it was suspect.
"Will sell for £19,000 (or near offer) and/or BUY IT NOW for £25,000 only!-or for any higher bid)"
So he will take £19000 but if you want to give him more money he will take that too, hmm very sharp :crazy:
Taking pics face on had legal arguements re infringing privacy but failed.
The other reason was flashing face on may impede a driver.
I believe the latest cameras do not flash face on.
Technology is a great thing eh?
No way dispute it.
With the average intelligence of a parking attendant if you have a substantive point to make they usually back down if you appeal.
If he/she can get the location wrong they have no integrity.
If they were 200yds away how could they see if your son was loading or unloading...
Like the owner says a beauty if only I had the money!
Well they call it a license to make it sound better.
Over the past few years I have built up a property porfolio to pay for my pension now the government wants to take more money off me for my ventures.
Gas and Electricity safety certificates I fully endorse but this is just another stealth...