After more research, I’ve read that anodised metal can have an optical effect on the surface of the very hard anodised layer. Engineering tests for this seems to have been researched here
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1350630708001647
The conclusion being - “The metallographic investigations of the cross section of the transparent anodized layer revealed the presence of pores. That means the stains are an optical effect due..”
as others and I have found, applying a product that adds a layer which coats the surface creating a optical effect (probable filling the pores), thus making the trim look like new.
With my tests, Peek Metal Polish gave fantastic results. Not that I believe it’s the abrasive in the paste providing the solution, it’s the protective layer that peek leaves behind which is fixing the issue. I believe the abrasive clean from Peek metal polish provides a essential ‘Clean’ of the metal before leaving a protective layer attached to the cleaned aluminium.
As quoted from information on Peek - “After use,
the polish leaves a gentle, invisible coating on the surface, meaning the metals continue to be protected from moisture and any further tarnishing, whilst preventing dullness and long-term staining”
I believe this optical effect, corrected by a thin film coating, is what we are seeing with WD40, Gt85, Peek and the likes of Wax Polish. Harsh abrasive cutting of the surface is not going to touch the hard aluminium, unless you are intending to completely remove the anodised layer and re-anodised, or leave as polished alu.
I would be interested to hear how this ‘film’ approach works on black anodised trim as I had this issue on my SL400 AMG. I’ve now sold that car. But back when I was looking at the black trim, I ended up having it wrapped in glossy black. Worked a treat, and lasted over 5 years till I sold it.