StringfellowHawke
Member
Had the E63 for coming up to a month now. I can honestly say it’s the best car I’ve ever had and love it. However....and this is were it gets controversial I’ve caught myself on more than one occasion wondering what the point of it all is. Hear me out.
Obviously with circa 500bhp the amount of time you can use full power on the road is less than the amount of seconds you can count on one hand. Therefore it stands to reason for 99% of the time (bar trips to the autobahn) you are driving a machine which you can only ever use a third of its available performance. Another way of looking at it is like Concorde being limited to 0.85 Mach coupled with the same fuel economy as being in supersonic flight. Or that of nuclear weapons. They are good to have but you’d be mad ever to use them in anger.
So apart from the acceleration and sound which i will be first to admit is addictive. What is the rational to having the amg say over the warm version of the same car.
I have my own thoughts (I’ve bought one don’t get me wrong ) and think it extends to greater than to just the on papers numbers. What are your thoughts ....
Obviously with circa 500bhp the amount of time you can use full power on the road is less than the amount of seconds you can count on one hand. Therefore it stands to reason for 99% of the time (bar trips to the autobahn) you are driving a machine which you can only ever use a third of its available performance. Another way of looking at it is like Concorde being limited to 0.85 Mach coupled with the same fuel economy as being in supersonic flight. Or that of nuclear weapons. They are good to have but you’d be mad ever to use them in anger.
So apart from the acceleration and sound which i will be first to admit is addictive. What is the rational to having the amg say over the warm version of the same car.
I have my own thoughts (I’ve bought one don’t get me wrong ) and think it extends to greater than to just the on papers numbers. What are your thoughts ....