Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The two points I made were:
(a) We need to have a public discussion regarding the standards required in order to obtain and more importantly to maintain Knighthood. Taking pot shots on ad-hoc basis at individuals when they are involved in scandal or otherwise get into the public eye for all the wrong reasons is not the best way forward.
(b) Bestowing a Knighthood on wealthy businessmen and industrialist will always pose an issue - I would argue that you can't go from rags to riches through observing the highest moral standards at all times - it is just not possible to become extremely wealthy while maintaining the ethics of a Buddhist Monk.
On the same note, Sir Tom Farmer who received his Knighthood for his Charitable work, made his fortune by selling Kwik-Fit to Ford for £1bn in 1999. We could very well bring Kwik-Fit's business practices during his time at the helm under scrutiny... he did not make his fortune by being charitable to his customers. Nothing wrong with the chap - hats off for his business success as well for his charitable donations - but once we stipulate that we expect those Knighted to adhere to the highest moral standards, as opposed to just behaving as businessmen do, we are coining a new oxymoron.
It is but when were you last in one!!? Totally lost track of the industry. Ive become a LIDL fan and I've even started using M&S more and more. And not just food.
As an anecdote... a lady by the name of Lin Macmillan was interviewed on Sky News today. She is (or rather, was) a BHS employee. When asked what she thought about Philip Green's proposal to make a voluntary contribution into the employees' pension fund in return for the probe into the case being dropped, she replied "It sounds to me like he is offering a bride, but we'll have to see how much money he is willing to give". Well I know what she meant to say, but I couldn't help seeing the funny side.
They had a reasonable lighting section.
As an anecdote... a lady by the name of Lin Macmillan was interviewed on Sky News today. She is (or rather, was) a BHS employee. When asked what she thought about Philip Green's proposal to make a voluntary contribution into the employees' pension fund in return for the probe into the case being dropped, she replied "It sounds to me like he is offering a bride, but we'll have to see how much money he is willing to give". Well I know what she meant to say, but I couldn't help seeing the funny side.
Sad but true. There is no level playing field on which high street stores can compete against out of town shops. In spite of successive governments going on about saving the High Street they have all failed to address the fundamental issue of parking: free at out of town centres but costing an arm and a leg in city centres.They did! But then, to access the Edinburgh store you had to pay for parking @ £5 an hour, walk a mile along Princes St only to find that you could have bought much the same thing from B&Q or PAGAZZI in any out of town mall. Philip Green notwithstanding any big anonymous store like Woolies or BHS are on a hiding to nothing nowadays.
They did! But then, to access the Edinburgh store you had to pay for parking @ £5 an hour, walk a mile along Princes St only to find that you could have bought much the same thing from B&Q or PAGAZZI in any out of town mall. Philip Green notwithstanding any big anonymous store like Woolies or BHS are on a hiding to nothing nowadays.
The commercial success of BHS and other high street stores in the age of the internet is surely a red herring in relation to the case in hand. The issue is the asset stripping of the employees pension fund while funding a luxury lifestyle to the detriment of long serving BHS staff who had paid pension contributions over the years in good faith.
BHS collapse: what happens to the retailer's pension fund?
But I am surprised at the hate campaign against him which singles him out for no obvious reason. Most people in his position are sadly the same.
Really...
I never met Philip Green in person (though I did see him in public) and judging from how he comes across on TV I probably wouldn't want him as a dinner guest either.
But I am surprised at the hate campaign against him which singles him out for no obvious reason. Most people in his position are sadly the same.
Some of my clients are very wealthy individuals and no different to Sir Phillip I am afraid.... but this is how the system works.
As for Sir Phillip's knighthood.... the simple answer is don't give honours to wealthy businessmen, there isn't a single one amongst them that is likely to be Canonised after their death.
And its always difficult to argue against a nihilist viewpoint which is why people often revert to them in discussions such as this . ;
Full Definition
a : a viewpoint that traditional values and beliefs are unfounded and that existence is senseless and useless
b : a doctrine that denies any objective ground of truth and especially of moral truths
Well I shouldn't be surprised really because it was well orchestrated by the tabloids who never miss an opportunity to 'mobilise the troops' if it can increase their circulation.
I
My point all along was and still is that Philip Green did what many - if not most - wealthy businessmen do. From living in tax haven, through running a luxurious lifestyle and a string of off-shore holding companies and Trusts, and up to asset stripping when they can.
...Don't taint all people in business. Maybe most of the wealthy business people you know are like that....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.