Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agreed. However, and by the fact that he plead guilty to Dangerous we can assume that he probably was, he rates as a prize muppet.They showed that video on the news today, it didn't look like he was doing anywhere near that speed, must have been the perspective.
Thats some speed to be going into that corner on a wet road.
I'm confused as to why they though a jail term was appropriate - do you have a link to the story?
Ahh that explains it.
Its one thing to risk your own life but another to do it with a pillion and a minor at that.
He should have got a better lawyer.
Given the vast numbers of community orders and suspended sentence orders dished out to scum who have caused real misery, pain & suffering I find that really quite astonishing.
Now who was it that got half that sentence for texting whilst driving just before a fatal RTA?
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article5801891.ece
No! Even without a pillion passenger, he was risking the lives of everyone else on that stretch of road. 122 mph in the pouring rain?!! I hope he would have received the same sentence if he had been on the bike alone.
Someone in our village was killed in his van on a corner on a 40mph road when a motorcylist misjudged the corner. The bike went head over heels after hitting a catseye and the rider went straight through the windscreen of the van travelling in the opposite direction. Effectively an 80mph impact (assuming the biker was keeping rigidly to the limit). Van driver killed outright, motorcyclist lived to do it all over again another day.
Risking his own life? The only time he would only be doing that would be on a disused airfiled or empty track.
Its difficult to try and describe to someone thats not been on a machine like this but as a sort of seat of the pants guestimation, driving on a motorway in my W124 at 80mph has a similar level of control of my Busa at 130+..... I'm tempted to say higher still actually but thats not the point really.
(If I were defending I would ask why it wasn't the driver of the 122mph Toyota Yaris in the dock... )
unless it was going backwards it would be hard to defend (the "-" to the right of the speed indicates the target vehicle is going away as against a "+" if it was coming towards as the Yaris is )
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.