Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Similar approach in Oxfordshire. They have had a policy objective for a few years that "there will be no NSL single-carriageway roads in Oxfordshire".This has alreaady been done in South Yorkshire
They quote 3000 deaths per year - so where did they dream this figure up from? Is it deaths of persons in cars or vehicles as a whole (inc Bikes, Lorries etc) or total deaths including pedestrians, people sitting in their living rooms etc??
3000 against the fact that there is 23 million+ vehicles on registered in this country is actually not a bad figure! As horrible as it sounds.....works out to 1 death per 7666 vehicles!
Unfortunately, the lunatics have been running the "road safety" asylum in this country for a number of years and sound practices with respect to the use of speed as described in Roadcraft have been progressively written out because they don't fit the new order. There's a huge body of research that shows that the drivers least likely to be involved in a collision are those who modulate their speed appropriately for the circumstances and in free-flowing conditions travel at or marginally above the 85th percentile speed for the road in question. However, that fact doesn't fit well with the "slower is safer" brigade, so current policy regarding speed limits actively ignores it.In relation to speed and safety , the following words from 'Roadcraft' are relevant
Ah smoking. Lot of "noise" from HMG, you get "fined" everytime you buy em (tax) and HMG quite likes the early mortality rate (less pensions to pay out) Who looks after you in the last throws of cancer, well normally a hospice - sometimes. Government funded hospices? - not a lot. No one is quite sure if smoking is a related accellerator to cancer, but most smokers seem to think not. They just nip out for the odd fag to shorten the odds a bit. Yup you guessed it Im a none smoker but dont mind them who do. Live and let live.
exactly. live and let live i believe in as well but why do they want us to actually believe that they really "care for our lives" hence the speed limits. the same people who care so much are planning on realeasing/ letting criminals with drug habits off the hook
My smoking example was used not to castigate smokers, but to prove that there are a lot more things taking more british lives than driving and if they are that concerned, they should pursue those things.
I mean saving so many lives 114k as opposed to 3k lives would look so much better or is it because of all the revenues that these two actions produce?
chasing motorists , good for cash
Leaving smokers to smoke, good for cash
chasing smokers, reduces 114k in death, not so good for cash
I think it is the hypocrisy of the whole situation that is making people worried. All adverts say hit someone at 30mph there is a chance of survival. at 40mph there is a chance of death.
Bingo just make the national limit 20mph and death would be reduced to zero instantly.
What exactly ae they trying to achieve here? zero road deaths, or a manageable number which is what? and why do they think specs cameras can enforce the limit? is the camera going to come down and slam your brakes on?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.