- Joined
- Jun 24, 2008
- Messages
- 47,844
- Location
- London
- Car
- 2022 Hyundai IONIQ 5 RWD / 2016 Suzuki Vitara AWD
As far as trains go, I think it’s the last hurrah for drivers. If any job is ripe for automation it’s train drivers. For everyone other than drivers, it’s got a lot going for it.
One of the issues stopping more capacity on the trains is the need to have reasonable gaps between trains. A lot of this is due to legacy stuff linked to drivers being in control. The other issues are also legacy - can’t have double height trains due to old Victorian railway bridges and can’t have longer trains due to station platforms.
The unions are doing a good job though but in this case they are flogging an old (iron) horse.
Doctors, I have a bit more sympathy with but don’t know enough to have a strong opinion.
I would agree that rail workers have a long history of industrial action, I remember the strikes when the rear guard role was replaced by CCTV cameras, the Unions claimed at the time that it was about 'safety', not about pay or jobs, etc. In fact it's not only in the UK - in the US, they still had a 'Fireman' on modern Diesel and electric trains well into the eighties because the Unions threatened industrial action if the firemen were made redundant when trains moved away from steam and coal after the War.