Petrol Pete
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
No
Not in my experience, as I have mentioned on here before my mother in law has given up driving but her trusty little 2006 VVT-i Toyota Yaris (petrol) is staying in the family to be used as a run around.
It has had an EML on for over a year now, when it first came on it was read as the cat blocked, we cancelled the EML and it breezed through the MOT with very clean emissions.
I left it at that and at the next MOT a few weeks ago I cancelled the EML and it breezed through again.
But now that I am driving the car more the EML is bugging me - and could be masking other faults in the background - I read the codes regularly and cancel the EML only for it to (obviously) pop back up again.
I thought about fitting a post cat sensor spacer kit widely available on line but there is no room between the sensor and the engine sump for it to fit.
The next option was to remove and clean the cat manually but because the engine in this little hair dryer of a car is a bit like a Japanese motorcycle the cat and the exhaust manifold are one part (the cat is right in front of the engine when you open the bonnet) not too much of a pain to remove but I am not mad keen to start that job on the driveway.
So as an experiment I bought a bottle of Cataclean and followed the instructions to the letter and lo and behold the EML came back on and the fault is still there.
I have taken it to my mates garage where he used his Snap-On code reader and he came up with the same code. It looks like I will have to remove the cat (when I can be bothered) and clean it manually.
I would never try this type of additive on my C55 - unlikely to ever need it as the Yaris was driven short distances at low speed, my AMG...quite the opposite - anyone else used this type of product ? what were your findings ? Snake oil ?
P.S as I understand it this EML can be triggered even when a Catalytic converter is still 90% efficient , hence the reason the car passes emissions with flying colours..your thoughts ?
Not in my experience, as I have mentioned on here before my mother in law has given up driving but her trusty little 2006 VVT-i Toyota Yaris (petrol) is staying in the family to be used as a run around.
It has had an EML on for over a year now, when it first came on it was read as the cat blocked, we cancelled the EML and it breezed through the MOT with very clean emissions.
I left it at that and at the next MOT a few weeks ago I cancelled the EML and it breezed through again.
But now that I am driving the car more the EML is bugging me - and could be masking other faults in the background - I read the codes regularly and cancel the EML only for it to (obviously) pop back up again.
I thought about fitting a post cat sensor spacer kit widely available on line but there is no room between the sensor and the engine sump for it to fit.
The next option was to remove and clean the cat manually but because the engine in this little hair dryer of a car is a bit like a Japanese motorcycle the cat and the exhaust manifold are one part (the cat is right in front of the engine when you open the bonnet) not too much of a pain to remove but I am not mad keen to start that job on the driveway.
So as an experiment I bought a bottle of Cataclean and followed the instructions to the letter and lo and behold the EML came back on and the fault is still there.
I have taken it to my mates garage where he used his Snap-On code reader and he came up with the same code. It looks like I will have to remove the cat (when I can be bothered) and clean it manually.
I would never try this type of additive on my C55 - unlikely to ever need it as the Yaris was driven short distances at low speed, my AMG...quite the opposite - anyone else used this type of product ? what were your findings ? Snake oil ?
P.S as I understand it this EML can be triggered even when a Catalytic converter is still 90% efficient , hence the reason the car passes emissions with flying colours..your thoughts ?