Gazwould
MB Enthusiast
Not so much peak gains there but a big improvement on the 1800 - 2500 rpm with the torque and power both coming in earlier .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Numbers without units - meaningless.Well this is getting confusing! I had our ML350 W166 remapped a few years ago by BFT/MSL and got the following results. The initial RR showed output of 277 from factory oppose to the 265 quoted, so my gains were not as much as expected, as I was quoted it should be approx 303 when finished.
My apologies, I thought it was obvious it was BHP I was referring to! The stock engine output quoted from MB is 265BHP and as we are talking about the 350 of this era and not the earlier variant, I mistakenly thought it was glaringly obvious, but obviously not....go figure!Numbers without units - meaningless.
Combining metric and imperial units - plain stupid. Pandering to customer's desire for the biggest numbers - go figure.
Of course. Just saying the car MAY have had an issue which was resolved by mapping.I call that improvement .
Either imperial - power in hp, torque in lbs.ft or, SI units power in kW and torque in N.m. Mixing them is just stupid It'd be SI all the way but in kW power looks puny - but torque looks bigger in Nm than in lbs.ft hence the crossbred bastardisation.No idea who has compared metric to imperial units, nor who's desire it is for the biggest numbers, do elaborate....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.