• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

Explain "Displacement" to a numpty please ?

poormansporsche

MB Enthusiast
SUPPORTER
Joined
Jul 1, 2010
Messages
4,849
Car
W209
Allways wondered and never known !

What makes a 2 litre for example ?

The C36 engine was a 2.8 M104 bored out to 3.6 litres - what does that actually mean ??

Cheers :)
 
It's the volume of air inside the cylinder.

When the piston is at full downward position (when the conrod is at the bottom of the crank shaft) the piston is at the bottom of it's stroke (bdc = bottom dead centre)

The intake valve has opened and the piston moving down has sucked in air (NA). The cylinder (if NA) was at atmospheric pressure before the upward stroke. The intake valve closes, then the piston starts moving upwards.

It's compressing that volume of air (displacing it, like if you got into a full bath, you'll displace some water, as it's not compressible, but air is) to create an explosive stoichiometric mixture with high oxygen content for the volume that air occupies.

(If forced induction (turbo or SC), the pressure before the upwards stroke will be higher than atmospheric pressure and so more air in, then the compression stroke, means more oxygen, which means you can inject more fuel and still maintain a good AFR, and that means a bigger bang, and you get more power out of each stroke)

The spark then fires roughly when the piston is at TDC (top dead centre), (how far either way of TDC is the ignition timing), and the explosive mixture ignites (it doesn't detonate, that's a bad thing), it just burns fast, that boosts the pressure in the cylinder to hundreds of PSI, and that forces the piston down again.

So in short, a 3.0L V6 has 6 x 500cc/ml cylinders = 3000cc/ml aka 3L.
The 2.8 6 cyl would have had ~466cc pots, the 3.6L would have been 600cc pots.

You can add capacity (or displacement) to an engine by either boring out, i.e, making the cylinders fatter, and using fatter pistons, or by keeping the bore the same but increasing the stroke, both give different final characteristics, but increasing the stroke would mean it'd need a different crankshaft and a lot more work which is why boring out is the simpler job.

Suck squeeze bang blow. :D
 
Last edited:
Displacement is the volume in the cylinder(s) that is swept by the piston on each stroke, in a 2 litre 4 cylinder engine each cylinder would have a swept displacement of 500cc :)

In the case of the 3.6 you quote then the original engine bore would have been opened out to increase the cylinder bore size along with larger diameter pistons, you can also increase the stroke or throw of the crankshaft to increase the swept area or both depending what sort of power output / torque increase values you are hoping to achieve.
 
Last edited:
It is the swept volume of all the cylinders summed.
Each cylinder has a volume calculated by multiplying its area by the stroke the piston traverses - the length of the cylinder.

It's influence on torque is derived from the pressure acting on the piston's crown surface area (more area = greater force) which is then applied via a lever (piston stroke) to the crankshaft (longer stroke = greater leverage).
It's influence on power is derived from a greater volume of air being consumed which can then burn a greater quantity of fuel. That aspect can also be achieved by super/turbo charging (greater air density = greater mass of air) or by increasing rotational speed (more individual induction events per unit time).
 
There is also the concept of compression Ratio and Clearance Volume:

Clearance volume is the volume remaining in the cylinder when the piston is at TDC. Because of the irregular shape of the combustion chamber (volume in the head) the clearance volume is calculated empirically by filling the chamber with a measured amount of fluid while the piston is at TDC. This volume is then added to the displacement volume in the cylinder to obtain the cylinders total volume.
An engine's compression ratio is determined by taking the volume of the cylinder with piston at TDC (highest point of travel) and dividing the volume of the cylinder when the piston is at BDC (lowest point of travel), as shown in Figure 15. This can be calculated by using the following formula:

Compression Ratio = (displacement volume + clearance volume)/clearance volume

1489_Compression%20Ratio%20and%20Clearance%20Volume.png


Compression ratio can be varied also by making the flat top of the piston either dished or domed. With domed pistons sometimes the clearance is so fine that semicircular indents are machined into the top of the piston to allow clearance for the valves when they open.
Here's a picture of a Porsche 928 piston that slightly dished and has valve cutouts.
dsc04760.jpg


P.S. another name for displacement is Swept Volume
 
Last edited:
To append to Grober's post, those dishes in the top of the piston crown are the difference between an interference engine and a non-interference engine.

By being able to clear the valves when the valves are open and the piston is at TDC, it means your engine won't destroy itself if the cam belt/chain snaps. A piston with flat tops will hit the valves and it all smashes itself to bits.
 
To append to Grober's post, those dishes in the top of the piston crown are the difference between an interference engine and a non-interference engine.

Not necessarily!

By being able to clear the valves when the valves are open and the piston is at TDC, it means your engine won't destroy itself if the cam belt/chain snaps. A piston with flat tops will hit the valves and it all smashes itself to bits.

The valve cut outs (pockets) permit piston to valve clearance within the cam timing employed. They do not guarantee a valve at full lift will not contact a piston.
 
When would a piston ever under normal operation be nearing TDC when a valve is still open?
 
Piston top depressions could also be swirl pots to aid fuel/air mixing
 
When would a piston ever under normal operation be nearing TDC when a valve is still open?

Exhaust stroke?
 
Here outside the Odeon cinema was where I first met Sarah. This is why displacement so much to me :D



What gets me is how to valve springs manage to close the valves circa 50 times a second on a high revving engine..
 
Is it how far the rings travel up and down X the diameter of the bore X number of cylinders?
 
On a related note... 'There's no replacement for displacement' :)


.....said the man with the 1.8L supercharged engine :(
 
Exhaust stroke?

Ah, so the exhaust valve only closes when the piston has pushed out as much of the exhaust gas as it possibly can, (TDC)?. I thought they'd have closed a bit before then. But that definitely seems more efficient.
 
I thank you all :)

Thing that confused me was "stroke"

IIRC GM 2.2 Engine was developed in Europe but was deemed unsuitable for the US market so the stroke was changed making the engine 2.4 L but retained similar power output - why would that be ?
 
I thank you all :)

Thing that confused me was "stroke"

IIRC GM 2.2 Engine was developed in Europe but was deemed unsuitable for the US market so the stroke was changed making the engine 2.4 L but retained similar power output - why would that be ?

Lengthening stroke compared to bore give more torque.... lazy slow engine

Wider bore compared to stroke is more power.... revvy quick engien


Could be the other way round.... but is is very rough..
 
The OP meant on a ****el engine.......:devil::devil:

Damn swear filter. W a n k e l

Now explain that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom