Bellow
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
However, some of the ideas combined with modern electronics, materials and manufacturing could just be worth another look![]()
A 'free' formula permitting 2T might just see some developments that aren't otherwise going to happen but could make 2T viable for road use - or at least as the lightest, most compact range extender engine.
Direct injection thus far a partial success using fuel pressures considerably lower than available with GDI. When fuel atomisation is the biggest hurdle with DI 2T, more scope here.
Looking at fuel efficiency over the decades of Cathedral diesels, there's a step change (from circa 35 to 50%) with the adoption of turbochargers (over mechanically driven blowers). Nowhere else will you find a 2T with a turbocharger other than the crazy end of the sledder's spectrum where they bolt them to the stingers of the expansion chambers. Lag not a problem with CVT and long, long gradients to be attacked at full throttle in one hit.
Piston rings are a weak spot on piston ported 2T and if wet sump is employed, prone to scraping unburned oil into the exhaust port which then appears as UBHC at the tailpipe. Ringless has been done. Not very well, there is a lot of scope there. Not only for the aforementioned reasons but for friction reduction also.
Cosworth wasn't making road engines when it developed the FVA and DFV, but from that (via relatively free motorsport engine regs} we got the classic tight included valve angle combustion chambers that are now the mainstay for SI engines. Same again please!