kinaero
Active Member
One of my friends was commenting how much better his E 250CDI saloon auto compares to C250CDI estate auto in terms of fuel consumptions. He's picking up his new E250CDI in Sept.
I didn't believe him, so he went on the merc site click on edition 125 and downloaded E class price list, and indeed, it was achieving better mpg figures than C class!
E class 45.6 urban, 67.3 extra urban and 57.6combined, which incidentally exactly same figures as E220 CDI !!!
C class 44.1 urban, 62.8 extra urban and 54.3combined
BUT !! When I downloaded E class ebrochure, the figures are completely different?!
E class 36.2 urban, 64.2 extra urban and 48.7combined, which are also exactly the same figures for E220CDI !!!
Hope I am not confusing anybody here? But which one is correct?
Unless I've made a mistake somewhere, an oversight like this shouldn't happened to a giant like Mercedes.
And surely Mercedes must risk having their orders being cancelled or sued by buyer whom bought the car based on first set of figures(assuming its incorrect)
I didn't believe him, so he went on the merc site click on edition 125 and downloaded E class price list, and indeed, it was achieving better mpg figures than C class!
E class 45.6 urban, 67.3 extra urban and 57.6combined, which incidentally exactly same figures as E220 CDI !!!
C class 44.1 urban, 62.8 extra urban and 54.3combined
BUT !! When I downloaded E class ebrochure, the figures are completely different?!
E class 36.2 urban, 64.2 extra urban and 48.7combined, which are also exactly the same figures for E220CDI !!!
Hope I am not confusing anybody here? But which one is correct?
Unless I've made a mistake somewhere, an oversight like this shouldn't happened to a giant like Mercedes.
And surely Mercedes must risk having their orders being cancelled or sued by buyer whom bought the car based on first set of figures(assuming its incorrect)
Last edited: