ItalianTuneUp
MB Enthusiast
To be selective in your "evidence" of history is not only abusive but also totally dishonest. Then others join in in an attempt to be ever more biased (they think witty or clever) like 8 year olds in the playground saying "rude words". One of the things I find most distasteful about my gender is the way when 2 or more are gathered together the conversation so often descends to the lowest possible denominator as they outdo themselves in crudeness and childlike behaviour. Men are so often afraid to stand out,say "hold on,thats a nasty,crude untrue remark" for fear of disapproval.
However as usual the real questions are evaded. How do such remarks from "feminists" affect you or the man in Barnsley? How do words far away compare with bodily injury done to women on an almost daily basis? How do a small number of female assaulters compare with the massive number of male attackers? Why do so many men appear to be frightened of women and therefore join in this persistent denigration of them? Men,what is your problem?
If you find what has been presented selective, then it is your prerogative to:
1. Explain specifically what gets you excited about the specific evidence presented.
2. Present contrasting evidence.
You have done neither, except go off on wild speculation, so it's hard, no impossible, to take you seriously.