- Joined
- Nov 6, 2007
- Messages
- 12,855
- Location
- North Oxfordshire
- Car
- His - Denim Blue A220 AMG Line Premium / Hers - Obsidian Black R172 SLK55
I think everyone who has or does use a Sat Nav, if honest, will have a story of abject stupidity to tell borne of blindly following the device's directions even when they could see events unravelling in front of them
I started using a sat nav for motorcycle touring in 2006 when, due to age related eyesight degeneration, I found that I could no longer just glance down at a map or route card on the tank bag and actually focus on what I was looking at! Motorcyclists generally want to ride on particular roads for any given journey, so I almost never use the default routes created on the device, instead using paper maps (normally Michelin) to plan the route offline on a PC which is then transferred to the Sat Nav. This means that I'm effectively following a "talking road book", and the prior planning that I've done with paper maps means that I already have a mental picture of where I'm going. This in my experience is the best way to avoid Sat Nav blunders: have a series of mental waypoints in mind before you set off and it's immediately obvious if the device is suggesting that you should go somewhere other than your intended route / destination.
Using COMAND in our cars is a quite different proposition as the offline route planning and route shaping capabilities just aren't there. When on touring holidays in the car I end up using a route I've planned offline on ViaMichelin to give directions, and the moving map on COMAND to verify any turns that are uncertain or ambiguous.
I started using a sat nav for motorcycle touring in 2006 when, due to age related eyesight degeneration, I found that I could no longer just glance down at a map or route card on the tank bag and actually focus on what I was looking at! Motorcyclists generally want to ride on particular roads for any given journey, so I almost never use the default routes created on the device, instead using paper maps (normally Michelin) to plan the route offline on a PC which is then transferred to the Sat Nav. This means that I'm effectively following a "talking road book", and the prior planning that I've done with paper maps means that I already have a mental picture of where I'm going. This in my experience is the best way to avoid Sat Nav blunders: have a series of mental waypoints in mind before you set off and it's immediately obvious if the device is suggesting that you should go somewhere other than your intended route / destination.
Using COMAND in our cars is a quite different proposition as the offline route planning and route shaping capabilities just aren't there. When on touring holidays in the car I end up using a route I've planned offline on ViaMichelin to give directions, and the moving map on COMAND to verify any turns that are uncertain or ambiguous.