Spinal
MB Enthusiast
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2004
- Messages
- 4,806
- Location
- between Uxbridge and the Alps
- Car
- x254, G350, Duster, S320, Mach1, 900ss and a few more
I just came back from a BCG vaccine trial... emphasis on trial as no vaccine was administered....
On Tuesday I had the mantoux test administered, and today I went to have it read. While I personally don't see/feel any hardening (just some localised reddening/erythema) the nurse wrote that I had an 8mm reaction, and decided that that was a Positive reaction.
Which is all fine and good were I a British person born in Britain of British ancestors... now correct me if I'm wrong, but the "boundaries" are
15mm in a low risk subject
10mm in a medium risk subject
5mm in a high risk subject
Now, while I don't feel I'm a high risk subject (never had an organ transplant, don't use drugs, don't have HIV) - I do think I'm a medium risk subject (recent arrival in the U.K. from a high prevalence country, employee in a congregate setting (international school), parent/ancestors from a high-risk region, lived in a high-prevalence region (sub-saharan))
Which makes me think I'm negative.
The reason I'm so hard headed is that 10-odd years ago, I had the exact same test done, and it came up negative. I then had to leave the country fairly quickly, and never had the vaccine done... which rules out a genetic immunity...
So my question really is - is there a risk to getting a BCG vaccine if the mantoux test really is positive? I know that in the states in a borderline case they would do another test (like the blood test with the impossible name); but alas not here...
I did go to a private clinic to get this done - I might pop by my GP soon; any advice?
M.
On Tuesday I had the mantoux test administered, and today I went to have it read. While I personally don't see/feel any hardening (just some localised reddening/erythema) the nurse wrote that I had an 8mm reaction, and decided that that was a Positive reaction.
Which is all fine and good were I a British person born in Britain of British ancestors... now correct me if I'm wrong, but the "boundaries" are
15mm in a low risk subject
10mm in a medium risk subject
5mm in a high risk subject
Now, while I don't feel I'm a high risk subject (never had an organ transplant, don't use drugs, don't have HIV) - I do think I'm a medium risk subject (recent arrival in the U.K. from a high prevalence country, employee in a congregate setting (international school), parent/ancestors from a high-risk region, lived in a high-prevalence region (sub-saharan))
Which makes me think I'm negative.
The reason I'm so hard headed is that 10-odd years ago, I had the exact same test done, and it came up negative. I then had to leave the country fairly quickly, and never had the vaccine done... which rules out a genetic immunity...
So my question really is - is there a risk to getting a BCG vaccine if the mantoux test really is positive? I know that in the states in a borderline case they would do another test (like the blood test with the impossible name); but alas not here...
I did go to a private clinic to get this done - I might pop by my GP soon; any advice?
M.