• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

JD Power 2009

Given the reputation they used to have, that is incredible performance from Jaguar, who iirc are also doing well in the UK version.

Lexus' positon is unsurprising, which I guess itself tells a lot about how we have come to expect reliability from them. We were certainly influenced by that when buying Mrs PXW's latest vehicle.

But Mercedes below average and below BMW? That ought to be worrying some senior management somewhere.
 
I surprised Scion are so low - isn't that a Toyota brand?

But as with all these surveys you need to know:

1. The questions that are asked.
2. Who they are asking.

I am of the opinion that you can get 'consumer surveys' to say whatever you want, provided you ask the right people the right questions.
 
I dont understand?

The industry average is 170 problems per 100 new vehicles? :confused:
 
I dont understand?

The industry average is 170 problems per 100 new vehicles? :confused:

Does that mean each car has 1.7 problems on average throughout the time period?

No wonder the new Mercs don't do very well!
 
From what I remember from looking at one of the questionnaires you are asked to identify ‘faults’. I’m not sure that ‘faults’ are differentiated. E.g. needing a new gearbox is a fault, so is a new wiper blade. I know which I’d be more concerned about!

The other difficulty is with expectation. If you buy a Ford or a Suzuki your expectation and definition of quality might be different from the person buying a Porsche. You might overlook small problems with a cheaper car that you might find unacceptable in an expensive car.

Not sure that these surveys provide much that is of value.
 
There are a number of JD Power surveys, one of which only rates cars during the first 90 days of ownership.

This one does not appear to stipulate if it is a 90 day survey or one carried out over a longer period. As Buick are at the top, and Mercury at number 5, I suspect it is only 90 days.

Russ
 
Last edited:
A little bit more of the study.

Gary

The study, which measures problems experienced by original owners of three-year-old (2006 model year) vehicles, has been redesigned to include 202 different problem symptoms across all areas of the vehicle. Overall dependability is determined by the level of problems experienced per 100 vehicles (PP100), with a lower score reflecting higher quality. The study is used extensively by vehicle manufacturers worldwide to help design and build better vehicles-which typically retain higher resale values-and by consumers to help them make more-informed choices for both new and used vehicles.

"In the current economic climate, consumers are delaying new-vehicle purchases and keeping their vehicles longer-the average age of a vehicle at trade-in has increased to 73 months in 2009 from 65 months in 2006," said Sargent. "This makes vehicle dependability even more critical. Automakers have improved long-term dependability by an average of 10 percent each year since the inception of the study, which is a testament to the industry's commitment to continuously improve and sustain quality, especially long-term quality. Making improvements in long-term quality not only satisfies customers who are holding onto their vehicles longer, but it will also influence their decisions when they return to the new-vehicle market or are seeking to purchase a pre-owned vehicle."

The study finds that the frequency and severity of component replacement has a particularly strong impact on customer loyalty intentions. Component areas for which the impact is greatest include engine and transmission. When engine components are replaced or rebuilt, just 11 percent of customers state that they definitely intend to purchase or lease another vehicle of the same make, compared with nearly 40 percent among owners who report replacing no components.

The study also finds that Buick, Lincoln, Mercury and Jaguar owners are less likely to replace components than owners of other vehicle brands. While component replacement rates are similar for premium and non-premium makes, there are notable differences between vehicle segments. Owners of models in the premium sporty vehicle segment are least likely to replace components, while owners of models in the van segment are most likely to replace components.

The 2009 Vehicle Dependability Study is based on responses from more than 46,000 original owners of 2006 model-year vehicles. The study was fielded in October 2008.

Find more detailed findings on vehicle dependability as well as model photos and specs by reading an article and reviewing brand and segment dependability ratings at JDPower.com.
 
There are a number of JD Power surveys, one of which only rates cars during the first 90 days of ownership.

This one does not appear to stipulate if it is a 90 day survey or one carried out over a longer period. As Buick are at the top, and Mercury at number 5, I suspect it is only 90 days.

Russ

Slightly more than 90 days - 3 years.

gary
 
I'd be interested in this type of survey with cars that are 5 and 10 years old respectively.....
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom