trapperjohn
MB Enthusiast
Santa bought a couple of new(ish) pushbikes to the Trapper garage. Which lead to a conversation about "pedaling furiously" Not as there is any danger of that happening here. Local myth and legend has it that the first such court case was brought after a cyclist was "knicked" for that self same heinous crime at a local hill known as Pear Tree Brow in Penwortham, near Preston.
Can anyone substantiate this please.
I thank you.
Taylor v. Goodwin (1879) 4 QBD 228, a case where the Queen’s Bench Division held, on appeal, that a cyclist was appropriately convicted by a magistrate for furious riding of a bicycle. The dicta of Justice Melor in the case has been cited and followed in a number of cases since: see, for example, Smith v. Kynnersley [1903] 1 KB 788 (cyclist not liable to pay bridge toll) and Corkery v. Carpenter [1951] I KB 102 (cyclist liable for offence where cycling drunk).
Can anyone substantiate this please.
I thank you.
Taylor v. Goodwin (1879) 4 QBD 228, a case where the Queen’s Bench Division held, on appeal, that a cyclist was appropriately convicted by a magistrate for furious riding of a bicycle. The dicta of Justice Melor in the case has been cited and followed in a number of cases since: see, for example, Smith v. Kynnersley [1903] 1 KB 788 (cyclist not liable to pay bridge toll) and Corkery v. Carpenter [1951] I KB 102 (cyclist liable for offence where cycling drunk).