In the post this morning stating that they've had notification from AN Other Insurance Co that my car was in an 'incident' at the doctors surgery on 30th Jan 2017. No other info but they wanted pictures of my car. On that day I was at the docs and did reverse into a parked car: squarely rear bumper to rear bumper but so gently that I did not notice. When I got out my car there was the other driver claiming that I had 'bumped' him, and, tbh, the cars were actually just touching. We closely examined both cars and agreed there was not a scratch on either. Mea Culpa nonetheless (I think). Shook hands like gentlemen do and went our separate ways. Looks to me like this guy is now trying it on. Any ideas where I stand? Especially if they decide to pay out based on his statement. Other than fair wear-and-tear there is not a mark on my rear bumper that could be attributable to any 'incident'/collision and it's obvious from the marks that are there that it's not been repaired/resprayed recently...if ever.