D
Deleted member 65149
Guest
Of course it's incorrect. I hate going to the shops. Especially with Mark!
Moron in 62 plate E320 - Fastest car on the road
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
CubbyMK
Active Member
It's my shop anyway and you are just being rude now!
renault12ts
MB Club Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2009
- Messages
- 16,671
- Car
- 2005 W215 CL500.
D
Deleted member 65149
Guest
Is it though? If so it ruins my theory about deleting the other person. In this instance it would read "Me went to the shops", which is clearly incorrect. But "I and Mark went to the shops" is also wrong isn't it? Me is now confused!
CubbyMK
Active Member
Is Mark your partner?
Mark is I - which makes that incorrect and/or a little bit sick/true.
D
Deleted member 65149
Guest
I like going to rude shops
... but only if Mark is paying! But of course it'd be in Euros now, not Marks.
CubbyMK
Active Member
As am I... wait, yes, me has got it!!!
renault12ts
MB Club Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2009
- Messages
- 16,671
- Car
- 2005 W215 CL500.
"I and Mark" is incorrect. The Me and Mark is not in general usage...but I don't think it is absolutely wrong...but I wouldn't use it...we haven't been introduced.
D
Deleted member 65149
Guest
Don't worry, Freud (Sigmund, not Clement) has an explanation for that
CubbyMK
Active Member
D
Deleted member 65149
Guest
Hi Mark ... I'm Tim
You're right that Mark is irrelevant to the grammatical construct.
Mark and I can do anything I can (being polite, I let him do it first).
Anything that happens to me can happen to Mark and me (being polite, I let it happen to Mark first).
But more important than grammar, WTF is this Mark and why did he pop up in this thread?
Last edited:
Coastguard to Boss <Sir, the SS Unlucky keeps transmitting "Ellipsis Our Ellipsis">
Boss <Tell the silly beggars to dit dit dah dit / dah dah dah>
Ted
MB Enthusiast
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2004
- Messages
- 7,064
- Location
- Bourton on Dunsmore
- Car
- Lexus RC300h F-Sport, Yamaha XVS 1100, Toyota C-HR GR sport
Just to add to the confusion, if you were Rastafarian, "I and I went to the shops" would be correct.
With regard to the original topic - the two cars are miles apart in terms of performance.
Having recently been in lane 1 of a dual carriageway, with a 530d in lane 2 (E60 - which is not quite the same as a W212 350 with 306, but not far off), I absolutely killed it. Maybe he thought it was an E320CDI?
I would expect a W210 E55 to be doing as it did in the OP's post.
Having recently been in lane 1 of a dual carriageway, with a 530d in lane 2 (E60 - which is not quite the same as a W212 350 with 306, but not far off), I absolutely killed it. Maybe he thought it was an E320CDI?
I would expect a W210 E55 to be doing as it did in the OP's post.
BigSilverEstate
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2012
- Messages
- 474
- Location
- London
- Car
- 2011 E350cdi Sport Estate, and the wife's car: 2008 Audi A4 Avant 2.0tdi
renault12ts said:
Why is I" and Mark" incorrect rather than just rude / odd? "I and a number of my friends went to rob a shop and deck some bloke called Mark" sounds right to me
renault12ts
MB Club Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2009
- Messages
- 16,671
- Car
- 2005 W215 CL500.
Last edited:
I've heard the expression but didn't realise that's what it meant, so I looked up its origin:
"often used in place of "you and I" or "we" among Rastafari, implying that both persons are equal and united under the love of Jah."
...which is very noble, if somewhat confusing.
Ted
MB Enthusiast
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2004
- Messages
- 7,064
- Location
- Bourton on Dunsmore
- Car
- Lexus RC300h F-Sport, Yamaha XVS 1100, Toyota C-HR GR sport
Paul/ said:
That's correct.
Users who are viewing this thread
Similar threads
