anarchy-inc said:
Sorry but if I'm doing 70 in the left lane, I'm NOT breaking the law. Imagine if you came round a long left hand bend on the motorway and then after the bend you come to this guy doing 60. How the hell would I have intentionally broken the law? Sorry mate but your argument doesn't hold up.
The behaviour of other people does not excuse your behaviour.
And if you are somehow surprised by the idiot in the outer lane
which 'forces' you to take some ilegal action the question arises
how you put yourself in that position. (The term 'due care and
attention' comes to mind -- which doesn't involve intent).
You see my problem? You have just pointed out that in the real world there are different interpretations of the highway code, one for cars and another for trucks. Which leads me back to my original point, please don't spout the highway code as the gospel truth as it clearly is not the way things happen in the real world. And as it happens, I rarely see another car use the lights to "inform others of their presence", it's usually to give some one the right of way at a junction . . .
I don't think it says anywhere in the highway code that you flash
your lights to do anything other than give warning of your presence
apart from overttaking truicks.
Truckers and motorcyclists are not supposed to flash each other
when oncoming.
If you react to another driver flashing you to indicate that he/she is
giving way then if an accident happens you are at fault. You either
misinterpreted the warning (bad) or reacted to an unauthorised signal
(oh dear, that's bad too).
The implementation of the headlight flashing rule on the road differs
from the real world. When problems don't occur then fine. However
if it leads to an accident the : "weren't my fault, he flashed me to
say I could turn" doesn't stand up and you're in hot water.