Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Repeat offendors spring to mind. House robbery, car theft/crimes and drugs etc. Many have been caught sentenced (cost the country a fortune) and do the same time and again. Dont get me wrong it keeps the judicial system going nicely wasting millions of pounds (i do not think this can help the GDP). There are very bad people that deserve wiping out but the major issue is the cost of the repeat offendors. 5+ offences cannot be wrong. Steal a car drive like a madman hit other cars and get a £60 fine whats that about. Wipe the scum out save time and money.I'm in favour of the principal.
However, it must be absolutely water tight, no possibility of wrongful conviction etc. Any doubt whatsoever it automatically becomes a prison sentence.
It also must be for a very defined set of offences.
Don't we technically still have the death penalty for treason in this country?
Hers's our first death penalty candidate...
BBC News - Leeds paedophile Daniel Taylor had 300,000 pictures
Yes and if it happens (which I very much doubt) I would be up for a career change, Executioner would look good on a business card It would also be nice to see some of the murders, child molesters, rapists, etc.. scum swing for what they have done :bannana:
nicely wasting millions of pounds (i do not think this can help the GDP)
I,m not bright i,m not clever but i do understand that increasing the cost or extenting the costs of prison services/ Judicery systems will not help our economic state (sorry i have tried to make it simple now). This will become more clear i am sure quite shortly (maybe that is why the death sentance issue came up?) ------ GDP can be determined in three ways, all of which should, in principle, give the same result. They are the product (or output) approach, the income approach, and the expenditure approach.i think your wrong about that, i'm sure that anywhere that money is spent, no matter what on, increases GDP. If you break your leg and go to the hospital to get it fixed this increases GDP and so on. I'm not 100% on this and i'm sure a more learned person will confirm this.
as for the rest of your rant, it's too stupid to comment on. Maybe fast ford's more you cup of tea
but there is not a politician with the balls to do it.
and should be mandatory for anyone that cannot spell except for when cribbing a theory
I,m not bright i,m not clever but i do understand that increasing the cost or extenting the costs of prison services/ Judicery systems will not help our economic state (sorry i have tried to make it simple now). This will become more clear i am sure quite shortly (maybe that is why the death sentance issue came up?) ------ GDP can be determined in three ways, all of which should, in principle, give the same result. They are the product (or output) approach, the income approach, and the expenditure approach.
The most direct of the three is the product approach, which sums the outputs of every class of enterprise to arrive at the total. The expenditure approach works on the principle that all of the product must be bought by somebody, therefore the value of the total product must be equal to people's total expenditures in buying things. The income approach works on the principle that the incomes of the productive factors ("producers," colloquially) must be equal to the value of their product, and determines GDP by finding the sum of all producers' incomes.
Example: the expenditure method:
GDP = private consumption + gross investment + government spending + (exports − imports) P.S Sorry to say i have never owned a fast Ford, only Volvos, Audis and a Merc not that it makes any difference. I suppose i am lucky that i have no relations or freinds that have issues with the law and have no contact with the dark side. I only see the bad things in criminals and the like.
Dave , whilst many of my postings are rather tongue-in-cheek , I do believe that there are many cases when the death penalty is fully justified. Unfortunately the law does not allow retribution by the public at large. There have been, and always will be miscarriage of justice , due in part to misguided/devious police ( i would like to think in the minority), and judges who are totally disembodied from the "real" world. I would really hate for it to be put to the test , but feel certain that if somebody willfully murdered one of my loved ones , I would not rest until they were dead. A lot of people have , (wrongly) stated that the death penalty should be carried out for financial reasons. I think we have to accept that there are people that are clearly evil , and can only atone for their crimes by the ultimate punishment , death.
In many cases , there is clear and irrefutable evidence of guilt , and in these instances I see no reason to keep them alive to bask in "celebrity".Pull the lever ? YES.
i think your wrong about that, i'm sure that anywhere that money is spent, no matter what on, increases GDP. If you break your leg and go to the hospital to get it fixed this increases GDP and so on. I'm not 100% on this and i'm sure a more learned person will confirm this.
as for the rest of your rant, it's too stupid to comment on. Maybe fast ford's more you cup of tea
it's a good point, there are some evil people out there that deserve no sympathy, i think this just highlights the lack of confidence people have in the courts.
there has to be some parity. a man kills someone, he gets life and serves at least 25 years, a women kills her 3 children, she gets 5 years. things like that make me question the justice system.
Use the full weight of the law and maximise prison sentences -not early discharges !-we will need more prisons-rehab does not work.
Agreed no prospect of death penalty
No it has at best a nuetral effect and given that no organisation operates at 100% efficency probably the opposite effect. All public "services" do is recycle money generated by "prime" tax generation.
So when a spending money they are just spending the same £ for a second time, not generating a new pound.
lmao
about the hanging issue...i believe in natural justice. the only way i would buy into this is victim retribution, if someone's family member has been murdered then if that person wants to seek revenge and kill the murderer then fair enough. i don't think it should be left to the state to decide whether someone should be put down. .
35 years in prison watching out not to drop the soap is way bigger than swinging from a rope.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.