kwakdonut
MB Enthusiast
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2006
- Messages
- 2,744
- Location
- Highworth, Wiltshire
- Car
- Frod Mundano TDCi, Kawasaki z650
He'll just buy another with next weeks wages......sickening and I'm a Man United supporter too.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's a very narrow minded view!
For 10% of his salary I would welcome being called an idiot.I think its more to do with the idiot driving it, that people are mocking
Not narrow minded at all. Accurate more like.
Born out by the circumstances of the "accident".
I guess you were there to witness the whole accident to make such an accurate judgement?
Not narrow minded at all. Accurate more like.
Born out by the circumstances of the "accident".
I think the insurance companies spend much more time with statistics than we do and they feel young road drivers are a bad risk.
Working in motorsport, I see many really talented race drivers who would be quite safe in that car at those speeds at that age. Those who race on track tend to drive much more safely on the road (by and large) even if some of them do share their IQ and shoe size.
Remind me again how old our current world champion is?
He favours a big ole GL to cruise on the road!
Re-read my post #7.
I didnt say ALL 23 year olds were not up to the job of driving a Ferrari.
I said very few were.
Agreed! I'm just speculating who the 'very few' could be
No.
But it doesnt take a genius or clairvoyant to have a damn good guess concerning the circumstances.
There was nobody else involved either pedestrian or vehicle.
The road was in good condition.
Visibility was not reduced.
The car was brand new.
One can only therefore make the logical assumption that the "accident" was due 100% to driver error.
Or to put it another way, driving too fast for the conditions.
Which in my view can be attributed to driver inexperience and lack of skills needed to drive such a car.
I wait to be proved wrong.
No.
But it doesnt take a genius or clairvoyant to have a damn good guess concerning the circumstances.
There was nobody else involved either pedestrian or vehicle.
The road was in good condition.
Visibility was not reduced.
The car was brand new.
One can only therefore make the logical assumption that the "accident" was due 100% to driver error.
Or to put it another way, driving too fast for the conditions.
Which in my view can be attributed to driver inexperience and lack of skills needed to drive such a car.
I wait to be proved wrong.
How many 23 year olds are expert enough drivers to pilot a Ferrari properly?
Very few.
I would hate to think how much his insurance will go up to.
The road was in good condition.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.