• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

S211 E280 Custom Intake & Filter

They do , engine / flywheel is fine because that's what everyone quotes , including car manufacturers , the illusion is much more sinister .

Look again .
Are you talking about the graph and where max power is.....
 
If you feel like the car is a dog, keep in mind the swirl flap motor can fail without a DTC and the engine will be in limp map.

Also all 280/320 factory crank sensors were superseded. The sensors fail to give accurate signal and the ECU injects fuel at the wrong time.
 
One last try .

Claim : 130 bhp to 189 bhp difference = 59 bhp

But the initial stock run reads 144 bhp thus....



2nd Claim : 189 bhp to 284 bhp difference = 95 bhp

But the initial stock run reads 214 bhp


Similar story with torque , can you now see the fraudulent issue here now ?
 
One last try .

Claim : 130 bhp to 189 bhp difference = 59 bhp

But the initial stock run reads 144 bhp thus....



2nd Claim : 189 bhp to 284 bhp difference = 95 bhp

But the initial stock run reads 214 bhp


Similar story with torque , can you now see the fraudulent issue here now ?
I'm thick. Now I see it.

They are just using manufacturer stats.

Would be interesting with something like an R34 which run at 25% more from factory.

Bastards.
 
You got there .

It's a crime , a dyno that over reads giving over generous stock and thus over generous remapped figures and then to claim the difference is from the lower actual manufacturer figure making the difference seem larger and give them a false market lead against the competition .

As you say there are those that do truthfully exceed manufacturer figures and of course some that are under .

As under did I find out with my 2.1 OM651 in 204hp flavour but with logical reason .
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom