grober
MB Master
Wishful thinking or fact? Ecclestone doubts Schumacher will stay in 2011 | Mercedes | Formula 1 news, live F1 | ESPN F1 or one more story from the rumour factory that's F1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fingers crossed it's true.
Toes crossed Eddie Jordan leaves too
Just more Ecclestone BS, The deal between Schumacher and Rosberg is running exactly as planned, Ross Brawn brought Schumacher in to develop the car for 2011 all the developments he has done this year have gone on Rosbergs car and hence the points gap, he was never brought in to be a championship contender in 2010. However for next year the gloves will be off and watch the difference then. The Schumacher deal was a 1 + 2 so my bet is he will take the 2 year option and carry on. You only have to listen to his interviews love him or hate him he is honest and when it is his mistake he says so, I'll think he'll be around for a while yet, wonder what odds I can get with William Hill for him winning the championship next year
Ecclestone of course talks whatever brings attention and money to the F1 business and BS is very good for this. But you cannot be serious about the Mercedes car being developed for Nico. On the contrary they made changes to the wheel base to make it more suitable for Michael. As a consequence, one GP was a complete disaster for Nico and just an ordinary disaster for Michael. Then Nico got it going better again.
Do they not get on then?He might even leave just to get away from Eddie J!
Michael's is the development car, Nico's is the race car, Michaels car has a lot of development parts on it which Nico's doesn't, a lot of which don't work so are discarded, only the ones that work are transferred onto Nico's car. The wheelbase change was made to accomodate a bit of radical thinking which too did not work as you quite rightly point out.
They don't put new development parts to a car unless their factory data shows the parts should improve the car. More often they do than don't.
Often the factory cannot build enough new parts for both drivers to enjoy and then the better driver, or in this case the favourite in terms of marketing, gets the new, improved parts.
If you try to say Michael suffers from using new parts, how do you explain Nico gains from those at a later stage if they did not make Michael's car better when Nico still did not yet have them?
It isn't lottery when new parts are developed and put to the car first time.
My understanding is that the longer wheelbase was maintained except for the Monaco race.
Why employ as a test pilot a jockey who has been 3 years out of the saddle?
flanaia1 - is this your opinion with the same facts as the rest of us, or do you have inside knowledge? Genuine Q.
Much as I know that MS is perhaps the best development driver of modern years (I remember what the Ferrari was like before MS got there), I can't help feeling that he's not a patch on where he was on the racetrack...
As for factory testing of development parts? What testing all testing is banned under the new rules no wind tunnel aerodynamic evaluations anymore it all done by modelling and theorists, if the modelling is good then the chance is the parts good if its crap well you get the picture so in some rspects it now is a lit of a lottery and only as good as the software used by the teams.
They don't put new development parts to a car unless their factory data shows the parts should improve the car. More often they do than don't.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.