pammy said:
there were 4 of the 170 - 200, 230, 320 and 32AMG. The latter two are the dogs danglies.
Oi !!! The 230k is not a bad little car either.
I agree with Pammy, horses for courses on this one :
If you want speed and have unlimited budget - buy a Bugatti Veyron
If you want speed and have large budget - buy an SLR or anything AMG
If you want speed and have medium budget - buy a WRX / Skyline / Evo /
If you want speed and have small budget - buy a plane ticket
If you want speed and have a tiny budget - buy a wrap from some spotty kid in a hoodie in town - but be aware it will be talcum powder.
If you want comfort and have unlimited budget - buy a super RV
If you want comfort and have large budget - buy a Bentley
If you want comfort and have medium budget - buy a coupe or saloon
If you want comfort and have small budget - buy sofa
If you want comfort and have a tiny budget - buy a cushion.
Now if you want a combination of speed and comfort, then depending on budget the choices become endless - that is why there are so many cars being manufactured, sold and driven.
I bought the 170 230K because I no longer felt the need for speed and wanted to get rid of my skyline which was doing 17mpg. Yes I could have bought a Honda S2000, but I spend a lot of time abroad which means the car spends a lot of time in car parks - solid hood versus soft hood seemed more secure to me.
Omis don't come on to a Merc forum and start claiming that MB cars suck, this is always going to result in a flaming.
It sounds to me like you bought an SLK thinking it was a "roadster". Not sure what your defnition of a roadster is but clearly the SLK came short of the mark - that's not the car's fault its yours, you should have bought a Boxter or an S2000.
Welcome to the forum by the way.
