Yugguy
MB Enthusiast
Just curious ... when/why do you need to turn the parking sensors off?
My drive gates have bushes, these set the sensors off when there's no danger of collision
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just curious ... when/why do you need to turn the parking sensors off?
I'll accept and use passive tech but not active tech. I'll never use tech that tries to park for me or change lanes for me or read speed signs for me.
Interestingly the complaint about having to use touch screen to do basic stuff has been levelled at the new Corolla. In my C I can temporarily turn off the parking sensors with a button - quite useful. In the Corolla it's five levels down a touch screen heirarchy.
@Yugguy Do you use any driver assistance tech at the moment, like adaptive cruise? Does your car have an automatic gearbox or airbags? If so, you have already ceded some control over to the car in terms of it decides when to change gear or when to deploy the airbags. I don't know how it works here, but Tesla mobile service seems quite good in the US where they come out to you.
I have the Mercedes driving assistance pack, and I like all the features and have used them. However, there are issues, some are physical but most cultural...
The one tap lane change in the C Class is great, on French Autoroutes when there are no cars though. Lane keeping assist is great, however it does not allow for some inbred halfwit in the next lane weaving about whilst fiddling with his touch screen or texting on the move, it gets a bit hairy and wont move the cars position. And in urban situations the default position for drivers in England is in your blind spot, so whilst active blind spot assist is good, in most situations in the UK this is useless is it wont allow you to flow into gaps, it has to be a manual process preceded by a good mark one eyeball every time.
The vast majority of English drivers also have a pathological aversion to driving at a constant speed, over/under reacting to threats and risk, doing 60mph for no reason followed by burst of 95mph again for no reason whatsoever. I don't know anyone who uses cruise control, usually with the excuse they can do it better which is utter rubbish. I genuinely think distronic with stop go pilot is one of the most sorted driver assistance systems on any car, however on busy English roads, it can get caught out by the ****wit factor, people diving into gaps at the last minute, or breaking excessively for speed cameras and such like, to the point where I don't feel confident using it. I drove a Renault with a similar system recently, it was outright dangerous in my opinion, I can only hope as per my previous statement most drivers wont attempt to use it.
The bottom line with this is that driver attitudes are the reason why self driving cars won't succeed at this time. We are already at peak driver tech. Self driving cars either assume all responsibility, and remove driver interaction completely, or we stay where we are. The problem both here and in the US is the issue of responsibility. Unless the law is changed, the driver is always responsible regardless of whether or not he tried to override the systems or a bad piece of software was the cause. The Boeing 787max issue is exactly what we are talking about here, a piece of software developed for safety but actually hampers and goes against pilot training, with catastrophic results. In the Aviation and the Maritime industry we often see accident reports cite a common cause of grounding/collision/allision/ground contact as 'Instrument Blindness', where a pilot or navigator fails to observe his surroundings for him/herself, relying solely on his/her instruments with out any way of checking the instruments and or software are functioning correctly. Most certainly, 99% of car drivers do not have the education, training and spacial awareness (even reaction time) of pilots or navigators, so I fear this folly of autonomous driving will not end well, and the arrogance of the Teslarati is staggering when attempting to discuss this.
As visionary as Musk is (I think the guy is full of **** but that's my opinion again) self driving cars are pie in the sky unless manufacturers step and assume total responsibility for the tech. And as Tesla have shareholders, that will never, ever happen. Even if the law changes.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.