- Joined
- Jun 24, 2008
- Messages
- 45,535
- Location
- London
- Car
- 2022 Hyundai IONIQ 5 RWD / 2016 Suzuki Vitara AWD
A personal view.
The poor man was happy with his 2nd hand fur coat, bought off the wealthy man, and he would expect to wear it for several winters.
But Stalin then decreed that the only coats made from man made materials could be worn, some BS about saving the eco system of the forests. The new type of coat wasn't as warm in the much colder weather, and worse such coats didn't have longevity as they would deteriorate rapidly.
The wealthy man could afford to replace his coat annually, so only a slight detriment to him.
The poor man bought a coat from the wealthy man but it had no purpose after a few weeks. He couldn't afford to do this each winter anyway so from then on he was resigned to losing ability to go out each winter.
Stalin's mates were happy as their industry made money selling more coats each winter.
Stalin was happy as his mates thanked him in financial terms for creating this innovative 'improvement' to forest preservation.
The bears continued to cr*p in the woods unaware.
True.
Stalin was a fact of life that the citizens of the USSR had to deal with. So are EVs and the looming ban on ICE cars....