Here's a fact:
Pedestrians are over twice as likely to be in an accident and be killed by an EV compared to an IC. The obvious reason is that EV's are quieter and that pedestrians walk into the road without observation. Does that make EV's evil compared to IC's. Interesting then to compare media coverage of this fact. All seem to blame the EV rather than passing any comment at all on pedestrians lack of observation. Rational headlines would have been along the lines of : Pedestrians are twice as likely to walk out into the path of an EV because they are too quiet. That's the fact but no media outlet seems to address it directly.
The Daily Mail calls EV's silent killers
The Sun says: YOU are twice as likely to be run over by an electric car.
The Telegraph: Electric cars kill pedestrians at double the rate of petrol or diesel vehicles.
The Guardian: Electric cars are more likely to strike pedestrians than petrol or diesel vehicles, particularly in towns and cities
Pedestrians are over twice as likely to be in an accident and be killed by an EV compared to an IC. The obvious reason is that EV's are quieter and that pedestrians walk into the road without observation. Does that make EV's evil compared to IC's. Interesting then to compare media coverage of this fact. All seem to blame the EV rather than passing any comment at all on pedestrians lack of observation. Rational headlines would have been along the lines of : Pedestrians are twice as likely to walk out into the path of an EV because they are too quiet. That's the fact but no media outlet seems to address it directly.
The Daily Mail calls EV's silent killers
The Sun says: YOU are twice as likely to be run over by an electric car.
The Telegraph: Electric cars kill pedestrians at double the rate of petrol or diesel vehicles.
The Guardian: Electric cars are more likely to strike pedestrians than petrol or diesel vehicles, particularly in towns and cities