Dryce
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
- Joined
- May 17, 2006
- Messages
- 10,910
- Car
- ..
Again I don't see your point in this context. This decision is not being justified by any fanciful notion of cost saving. Since cost saving could only be achieved by keeping the business in public hands, this decision is one based on an ideological commitment to privatise as much of the NHS as possible. In financial terms, the decision has no basis whatsoever.
I don't care. I just see it as something that is being picked at by a biased critics and biased media. It may well be the case that it is being proposed by biased politicians or managers - and that on the other side a biased media is not being critical.
Which is why I'm inclined to detach from the likes of the Guardian and the Labour Party and the Government and its crony media and just want it laid out and explained - without the emotion, dogma, and politicking.
From my perspective anybody pointing the finger and mentioning profiteering and ideology and greedy middlemen or whatever isn't being objective - just taking part - intentionally or indavertently in the polticking.
And saying its not necessary to lay out that explanation seems to me like an excuse to avoid the truth and point fingers regardless. You may be right - but the information laid out so far leaves me dissatisfied with both sides.