Scott_F
MB Enthusiast
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2010
- Messages
- 4,165
.......and it would seem that this character is not one of them.
I was engaged in some idle browsing on Gumtree and saw the ad below. Apparently, the car is a "low mileage bargain", is a "grate runner" and, best of all, "only just ran out of mot on the 20th it will pass mot".
Ford ka ☆☆low mile☆☆ bargain ☆☆ | in Rugby, Warwickshire | Gumtree
A quick on-line check reveals that the car was in fact submitted for an MOT some three weeks ago (on the 16th) and it failed in some style:
Date:
16/09/2017
Result:
Fail
Refusal Notices
Obviously, in this sector of the market it's very much a case of bottom fishing and you never believe a seller who says that a car "should pass another MOT" because if they really believed that then they would submit it for one.
But even with that in mind, this does seem like a monumental case of dishonesty !
I was engaged in some idle browsing on Gumtree and saw the ad below. Apparently, the car is a "low mileage bargain", is a "grate runner" and, best of all, "only just ran out of mot on the 20th it will pass mot".
Ford ka ☆☆low mile☆☆ bargain ☆☆ | in Rugby, Warwickshire | Gumtree
A quick on-line check reveals that the car was in fact submitted for an MOT some three weeks ago (on the 16th) and it failed in some style:
Date:
16/09/2017
Result:
Fail
Refusal Notices
- Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.c.1d)
- Nearside front headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.a.1b)
- Offside front headlamp aim too low (1.8)
- Offside rear brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.b.2c)
- Nearside vehicle structure has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.b.2)
- Offside front macpherson strut has excessive movement in the upper support bearing assembly (2.5.b.1b)
Obviously, in this sector of the market it's very much a case of bottom fishing and you never believe a seller who says that a car "should pass another MOT" because if they really believed that then they would submit it for one.
But even with that in mind, this does seem like a monumental case of dishonesty !