D
Deleted member 65149
Guest
I don't have an issue. I was only challenging your earlier statement that "With old, high mileage, cheap Mercs you tend to get what you pay for. For £2k I would throughly expect it to be rusty ..."by giving an example of an old, high mileage Merc of similar value that was in good nick. You then responded by saying mine "wasn't a 170k miler W210 diesel estate ...", thereby limiting your earlier all-encompassing criticism of Mercs. But you'd also agreed with Ian that Lexus produced a much better model. So my minor issue was that you were happy to offer an example of a totally different make of car to prove your point about Mercs being expensive rust buckets, but wouldn't accept my proof that your original statement most certainly wasn't true.As has been pointed out, it was a reply to another member's post - nothing to do with your post so I don't see your issue?
Fact is - you were comparing apples with oranges. As a W210 owner who has looked at loads as well, I can honestly say that the very vast majority of these cars have rust - it's what you should expect to find and not be surprised about
The OP had said that he expected more for his money. You said he was being unreasonable. I merely gave an example to support the OP's expectations, expectations that I considered to be perfectly reasonable.
I agree that most, not all, W210s have a bit of rust around the wheel arches and perhaps one or two minor faults. But those I'd expect to see for half the price, like this one for instance: Mercedes-Benz E Class E240 ELEGANCE 7 SEATER TIP AUTO [2.6] 5dr 2002 For £2k+ I'd expect something better.
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classif.../page/1/radius/1501/postcode/pe78ep?logcode=p