Teflonso
Active Member
It's a long thread, but I'll throw in my two penn'orth.
Contrary to statements and conclusions so far, steel IS a retroreflective material, at least in terms as in the Oxford English Dictionary of the term "retroreflection".
I make this bold claim on the basis of spending my entire career in the shiny steel industry, a lot of it concentrating on making the stuff even shinier. I've had my hands on the measuring gear once or twice and used to talk gloss measurements and specular reflectance with customers. Strictly speaking, anything short of the soot at the back of your fireplace is retroreflective and unless the law specifies exactly what proportion of light has to be refelcted back, then even dull aluminium qualifies. Even wood.
The steel that came out of the factory before someone blanked and pressed it with numbers was retroreflective. As arguably, is the paint that was applied on top. Except the black lettters.
Acrylic, on the other hand, ISN'T retroreflective. At least, the clear perspex on the front of the plate isn't, since light goes straight through it. It's the yellow or white plastic behind that provides the retroreflectance.
That the plod's ANPR camera can't identify the letters when looking through a glass windscreen is no proof of reflectivity, it's just an indication of how good the equipment itself is. Any old-time photographer with light meter in pocket can demonstrate this.
However, I'd guess the real offence is having the wrong font (German style plates are not acceptable) or having raised letters, which is also verboten in the full regs. But, if Plod gave me a ticket which explicitly stated only the retroreflective bit, I'd happily have my day in court and get it chucked out on this technicality.
.
Contrary to statements and conclusions so far, steel IS a retroreflective material, at least in terms as in the Oxford English Dictionary of the term "retroreflection".
I make this bold claim on the basis of spending my entire career in the shiny steel industry, a lot of it concentrating on making the stuff even shinier. I've had my hands on the measuring gear once or twice and used to talk gloss measurements and specular reflectance with customers. Strictly speaking, anything short of the soot at the back of your fireplace is retroreflective and unless the law specifies exactly what proportion of light has to be refelcted back, then even dull aluminium qualifies. Even wood.
The steel that came out of the factory before someone blanked and pressed it with numbers was retroreflective. As arguably, is the paint that was applied on top. Except the black lettters.
Acrylic, on the other hand, ISN'T retroreflective. At least, the clear perspex on the front of the plate isn't, since light goes straight through it. It's the yellow or white plastic behind that provides the retroreflectance.
That the plod's ANPR camera can't identify the letters when looking through a glass windscreen is no proof of reflectivity, it's just an indication of how good the equipment itself is. Any old-time photographer with light meter in pocket can demonstrate this.
However, I'd guess the real offence is having the wrong font (German style plates are not acceptable) or having raised letters, which is also verboten in the full regs. But, if Plod gave me a ticket which explicitly stated only the retroreflective bit, I'd happily have my day in court and get it chucked out on this technicality.
.
Last edited: