k77nrs
Member
Perhaps...in a separate thread?
good point, will take a look!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Perhaps...in a separate thread?
W114 has six cylinder engines ; W115 four cylindercan anyone explain the main difference between the W114 and W115?
Thanks, any thoughts on which is the better engine choice? I guess 6 cylinders are probably better?W114 has six cylinder engines ; W115 four cylinder
Being one of 4 kids I was brought up on seven seat estates....initially Volvo 240’s and latterly Renault 21 Savanna’s....my dads last company car was an E36 AMG....was a very rare car, and he absolutely loved it. The performance was exceptional compared with the prior Volvos and Renaults.Like one or two others on here , I grew up in a 'Mercedes family' with my dad buying his first new one in 1964 , after a succession of Jaguars , Rovers , Fords and others , some of which I remember . We also had Land Rovers , and after the first Merc going in for its service and being given a VW Beetle as a courtesy car , we always had one in the family right up until they stopped making them . Besides Mercs , we have had countless VWs and Audis in the family as well .
I started with Mercs when I was 17 , have always had at least one , and am now 62 .
Oh , I’m not belittling all the new technology , although it largely falls into the ‘active safety’ category- that is avoidance of a crash is preferable to surviving it .Yea my family had Volvos and MBs from the mid- 60s. No arguing that, in their time they & SAABS, were likely the safest cars on the road. However we have moved on and a shell of steel does not necessarily make it safer. I'm sure that proponents of the older 'tanks of steel' will find ways to "subjectively prove" that their cars are just as safe. However with all the statistics available there is ample empirical proof that modern cars are safer.
It depends what you want .Thanks, any thoughts on which is the better engine choice? I guess 6 cylinders are probably better?
I just had a look on 'How many left'Last month, which given that I'm not really getting out much at the moment is fairly recently. Clearly there's a much more even distribution of older cars around these parts compared to Central Scotland.
Except that you are comparing old Jap cars built in a time when their quality was not the greatest. Look at the standard of today's Japanese car.I just had a look on 'How many left'
Taking a typical basic car popular in the seventies , I picked the VW Beetle - now , How many Left list them as individual models , so I picked the 1300 as typical - it showed around 700 still taxed across the four quarters of last year , and a further 800 or so SORN .
Then I looked at a typical Jap thing , I remember the roads used to be infested with Datsuns , so looking there , I remember the Sunny was a popular model ; last year there were SEVEN left taxed in the UK , and 27 on SORN .
Take another popular model back then , the original Honda Civic - there are 5 taxed and 5 on SORN as of last year .
That says it all about the relative longevity of Jap stuff versus European , and particularly German .
Just in case you think the Beetle is a better than average car , and remember I looked only at one of the numerous models within the range , I then looked at the worst of the British Leyland output = the All-Aggro of which there are 11 and 25 respectively , so even these are doing better than the Jap stuff , admittedly not by much .
I rest my case .
Wasn't the Beetle the most produced car in the world at the time?Except that you are comparing old Jap cars built in a time when their quality was not the greatest. Look at the standard of today's Japanese car.
An interesting perspective which is, as another might note, a bit of a generalisation. No?
I've only owned nine cars in the last 50 years and the previous one was a 300CE-24 bought in 1997. I px'd it in 2001 for the present E320 coupe. The transaction was by phone with a former MB dealership in Brighton - they took my car unseen and I bought their car unseen. I drove from Edinburgh to Brighton and back in the day and 19 years on is evidence enough that the deal was a success.
Of course, there have been some unannounced repair bills - wiring loom being the most costly as well as a rear suspension rebuild - but, like a Rolls Royce, the car has never failed to proceed. As you infer, costs can be a minefield but they can be offset against notional or actual depreciation. Being somewhat anally-retentive and unable to cast off a previous life in finance, my meticulous records show that, excluding the purchase price, over forty-four thousand of my dodgily-earned pounds have been lavished on the bugger. To be fair, tax, insurance and fuel are unavoidable so it works out at c.50p per mile.
I don't do any DIY but can assure you I do get a very intense feeling of involvement whenever my wallet is is produced from the vault.
"In short, an immensely rewarding and engaging experience that 'car as commodity' owners will never experience."
Agree.
I really don’t perceive them as any different; they last well up to around five years old ; between five and ten years old most of them fall apart , beyond ten years old their decline accelerates beyond that of the more durable cars made by the better European manufacturers . One only needs to look at what is on the roads compared with what fills the scrapyards - even then , Pacific rim cars , including Jap , don’t tend to hang around before being crushed because most owners use them as ‘commodity’ cars and won’t bother repairing other old ones which remain . They also tend to be bought by people who have no interest in cars , or maintaining them .Except that you are comparing old Jap cars built in a time when their quality was not the greatest. Look at the standard of today's Japanese car.
What was the pick-up that they couldn't kill on Top Gear?I really don’t perceive them as any different; they last well up to around five years old ; between five and ten years old most of them fall apart , beyond ten years old their decline accelerates beyond that of the more durable cars made by the better European manufacturers . One only needs to look at what is on the roads compared with what fills the scrapyards - even then , Pacific rim cars , including Jap , don’t tend to hang around before being crushed because most owners use them as ‘commodity’ cars and won’t bother repairing other old ones which remain . They also tend to be bought by people who have no interest in cars , or maintaining them .
......................One only needs to look at what is on the roads compared with what fills the scrapyards - even then ...............
But pulling off running a classic as a daily is quite a trick. As rewarding as it can be frustrating!
What was the pick-up that they couldn't kill on Top Gear?
Was is an elderly Mercedes?
Nuh.
Do you own a W115/ W123/ W124/ W126? After sorting these, I no longer needed a new car. They are far more reliable than anything o n sale.
Don't really watch Top Gear but Fifth Gear did fire a canon into a W124, submerged it into water and then dropped it off a building. Still started. Episode's on Youtube somewhere. What was your point again?
They may possibly have outsold European manufacturers on the global , market ; I'm not sure that is true within the UK or even European Market where I think the majority of cars on the road are still Euro makes . One also has the tricky decision of what constitutes a European car with Nissan and others building cars here ."Correlation does not imply causation." - I don't know the number but "Pacific rim" cars have substantially outsold "European manufacturers" for many years which implies that there will be more in the scrapyards and not that they are worse cars.
I'm not saying that they are better but your reasoning appears flawed.
If such a 'simple' new car could be made at a lower price than other cars , it might find a market with people who would struggle to buy more expensive new cars . Alas the economics are not in its favour since much of the cost is in running the factory , paying the workforce , setting up a dealer network ... and the details of the car come some way down the scale .The problem with discussing the reliability of old Mercedes vs new, or any other make for that matter, is that no one makes a simple new car anymore that would constitute a direct comparison. New cars seem an order of magnitude more complex which means there is so much more to go wrong. If a new simple car did exist it could be easily as reliable as any of the old ones. The quality that old cars had was simplicity. It will never happen though as there is no market for a simple high quality car or at least not a financially viable market. Most buyer want an ever increasing number of toys.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.