Would you buy one....

Abb

MB Enthusiast
SUPPORTER
Joined
Aug 28, 2013
Messages
3,208
Location
UK
Car
Mercedes
It's a no from me too!
 

Eddy77

Active Member
SUPPORTER
Joined
Jan 31, 2016
Messages
720
Location
Fleet, Hampshire
Car
2008 CLK 350 Sport Cab, 2019 Audi A6 Avant 40 TDi S-Line
Better than the evoque. But then that’s like saying that flu is better than pneumonia!

It’s still a minger. It’s a no from me.
 

91dm

Active Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2010
Messages
880
Location
Irl / Uk
Car
A few
Not for me but my sister would probably like it, must be a market for them!
 

jdrrco

MB Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 6, 2006
Messages
1,241
Location
South Wales
Car
X218 CLS500 AMG BlueEfficiency Sport Shooting Brake - name almost as long as the car...
Another no, for all the reasons above.
 

GeeJayW

MB Enthusiast
SUPPORTER
Joined
Apr 24, 2017
Messages
3,535
Location
NW Blighty
Car
S205 C250d AMG Line P+, MX-5 25th Anniversary Edition
Nope!
 

clk320x

Hardcore MB Enthusiast
SUPPORTER
Joined
Sep 27, 2016
Messages
10,384
Location
East Midlands
Car
W212 E250 CDI Sport - S211 E320 CDI Avantgarde - S203 C32 AMG
Another no from me.
 

markjay

MB Master
SUPPORTER
Joined
Jun 24, 2008
Messages
27,773
Location
London
Car
W204 C180 Executive SE 2013 Automatic / COMAND NTG4.7 and Morel speakers fitted by www.comand.co.uk
I am not looking for open-top motoring so wouldn't buy one.

Said that, why would this one be any different to the Evoke or to the smaller Mini etc?

(Not that I would buy an open-top Evoke or Mini).

So what in your opinion makes this car stand out as a car you wouldn't want to own?
 

markjay

MB Master
SUPPORTER
Joined
Jun 24, 2008
Messages
27,773
Location
London
Car
W204 C180 Executive SE 2013 Automatic / COMAND NTG4.7 and Morel speakers fitted by www.comand.co.uk
I am partial to the International Harvester Scout II... I did drive one on the seventies.
 

Pontoneer

Hardcore MB Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 19, 2002
Messages
14,904
Location
Central Scotland
Car
'99 S320 W140
If I was in the market for that sort of thing ?

Cue MB filling that segment with GLC cabrio ?
 

Mactech

MB Enthusiast
SUPPORTER
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
3,380
Location
Biddulph
Car
Audi A8 50 Tdi, Mazda MX~5, Land Rover Defender, VFR1200
I can sort of see the point of such a car.
What a car looks like is the first consideration for most it seems, but as an engineer, just not for me.
We have an old Defender for goodness sake! (Why have you got a farmers car? asked one of my wife's friends!)
It's a family pet really, but actually rather good at all weathers and the terrain of the peak district, where my wife works.
We added a convertible MX-5 to the fleet recently. Great little fun car, much more civilised than the Defender, but much harder to see out of at the hilly and high hedged rural junctions.
Now I wonder if they make a convertible with a higher seating position.....:dk:
 

grober

MB Master
Joined
Jun 22, 2003
Messages
28,450
Location
Perth, Scotland
Car
W204 C200CDI Estate
One thing that was barely touched on in the otherwise excellent historical review linked by Markjay was the construction of the early SUVs being "Body on Chassis" whereby a non load bearing body was grafted onto a separate ladder type chassis which gave it structural rigidity. This meant that sawing off the roof had very little effect compared to doing the same thing in a monocoque car which relies on the roof plus pillars to complete the rigid box from which it derives its main strength. With few exceptions most modern SUV;s are monocoque construction meaning chopping off the roof means lots more floorpan/bulkhead metal re-inforcement to maintain rigidity and resist the dreaded chassis flex. Lower safety and crash resistance is a given and not just from roll over. Passenger occupancy space intrusion is inevitably compromised perhaps typified by the question- " where are the curtain airbags then?" and re-inforced by the fact that anyone doing serious offroading in one of these adds a substantial roll cage from the off. Those big body on chassis 4x4 American trucks looked butch but tended to fold like a pack of cards in any serious collision and the concept of crumple zones was a tad namby pamby . ;)
 

Pontoneer

Hardcore MB Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 19, 2002
Messages
14,904
Location
Central Scotland
Car
'99 S320 W140
I can sort of see the point of such a car.
What a car looks like is the first consideration for most it seems, but as an engineer, just not for me.
We have an old Defender for goodness sake! (Why have you got a farmers car? asked one of my wife's friends!)
It's a family pet really, but actually rather good at all weathers and the terrain of the peak district, where my wife works.
We added a convertible MX-5 to the fleet recently. Great little fun car, much more civilised than the Defender, but much harder to see out of at the hilly and high hedged rural junctions.
Now I wonder if they make a convertible with a higher seating position.....:dk:
Well , you can always unbolt the roof off your Landy in the summer months .
 

Mactech

MB Enthusiast
SUPPORTER
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
3,380
Location
Biddulph
Car
Audi A8 50 Tdi, Mazda MX~5, Land Rover Defender, VFR1200
Well , you can always unbolt the roof off your Landy in the summer months .
It's not quite the 10sec 'roof rescue' of the MX-5, a feature much used here, even in the alleged summer months!
 

David404

Active Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2015
Messages
759
Location
West Midlands
Car
GLE350d (W166)
No.

For me it's a pointless and stupid concept a convertible SUV. To make this work it's has to go beyond pointless and stupid, it had to be completely batshit stupid, laughable lunatic of an idea. A full size SUV a proper off roader convertable but with a 500+bhp NASCAR snarling V8 under the bonnet. Now there's a proper off the scales stupid idea. Convertable G63 AMG anybody?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top Bottom