• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

Another Con

wobbly

MB Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
1,529
Location
Middlesex
Car
2018 GLC 220d AMG line Premium + 1989 500SL Now sold, replaced with 2007 Aston Martin DB9
Sorry I dont know how to link to this ebay advert, but its another scam.

1969 280sl for £4200, item number 230086287427
 
Looks a bargain.

Do you reckon he'll take £3400 for it?
 
fatherpierre said:
Looks a bargain.

Do you reckon he'll take £3400 for it?
:) I wish :)

John the wishful thinker
 
I looked at the Pre-approved thing and wondered how the con worked, then I found this
which is a very effective con, particularly if you are new to ebay.

you need to trust your gut instinct and the old saying: "if it seems too good to be true..."
 
Here is what I found out about the vehicle

Regards,
John

Date of Liability 01 10 2006
Date of First Registration 19 08 1969
Year of Manufacture 1969
Cylinder Capacity (cc) 2778CC
CO2 Emissions Not Available Fuel Type Petrol
Export Marker Not Applicable
Vehicle Status Unlicensed
Vehicle Colour RED
 
glojo said:
Here is what I found out about the vehicle

Regards,
John

Date of Liability 01 10 2006
Date of First Registration 19 08 1969
Year of Manufacture 1969
Cylinder Capacity (cc) 2778CC
CO2 Emissions Not Available Fuel Type Petrol
Export Marker Not Applicable
Vehicle Status Unlicensed
Vehicle Colour RED

The car looks fantastic, but such a pity, that some con merchant is trying to rip people off!

I would expect a car of that quality to be 20K +
 
glojo said:
Here is what I found out about the vehicle

Regards,
John

Date of Liability 01 10 2006
Date of First Registration 19 08 1969
Year of Manufacture 1969
Cylinder Capacity (cc) 2778CC
CO2 Emissions Not Available Fuel Type Petrol
Export Marker Not Applicable
Vehicle Status Unlicensed
Vehicle Colour RED

and here's what I found out

In the photographs it's parked outside a pub in Kent - Tonbridge to be precise

Before anyone else tells me I accept that my info is slightly less useful than John's
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom