• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

Big/loud exhaust doest it affect fuel consumption?

Interesting! I've only ever been able to do this with liquid unobtainium perviously:rolleyes:

Correct - for older engines. On more modern power units, there is a risk that you may compromise the Imibilo block and create interference patterns within the Metapolar refractive pilfrometer.
 
Without knowing exactly which Fararri engine you have, it is difficult to answer accurately.

If you fit 27 monastically spaced neodymium injectors around the bellhousing, arranged to feed the downstream turbine exhaust vents with a mixture of high 'S' value phenol hydrobenzamine and a 5% concentrate of remonitorive tetra-ioda hexamine. This should offset any possibility of increased fuel consumption. Remember though, that both liquids have specific periscosities, given by the formula P = 2.5C x 6.7 / N where N is the di-ethical evolute of retrograde temperature phase disposition and C is the shelmondolaze angular grid coefficient. If you set things up with a Signature series Schottky auto-calibrating hopper datascope to measure the exact quantities, it should be fine.

It is important that the exhaust does not intermesh with the regurgative purlwell and the super-native weanel sprocket. Adjust the Lotuso-deltoid windings if that is the case, alternatively, use a series of offset 3Kilohertz anhydrous nangling pins to enable a cryptonaptic bowling shim to be tankered at the inlet manifold.

You can work out the Bernoulli constant for calculation of Neutrino flow stack requirements: Nodal value = Quantative hydraxis squared / Trignometrical amplitude times Pi. This will let you configure your Multiplexed, Torroidal stream Cadmium coated concentric tambur shafts to match the Tambourelli bevelled gearsets.

Hope this helps.

That wasn't very helpful post really when it should be di-hexamine and not just plain hexamine! :mad:
 
That wasn't very helpful post really when it should be di-hexamine and not just plain hexamine! :mad:

I'm not sure I agree with that. Hexamine was introduced as a replacement for Rea and so titled in order to avoid any unfortunate confusion as had been the case with Rea and Di-Rea.
 
Exhaust or for that matter intake changes impacting on engine performance and therefore fuel economy stem from the days when fuelling was open loop. A loud exhaust with less back pressure weakened the mixture so unless the mixture was corrected, more noise could mean less power. Even in modern cars where mixture correction is closed loop and automatic, both intakes and exhausts can be tuned to take advantage of reflected pressure waves. Changes that interfere with the manufacturers original intent are very unlikely to be an improvement or if they are in a certain rev range it will be to the detriment at some other revs.
 
To analyze exhaust gases flow in an area of interest, the partial differential equations (Euler equations, Navier-Stokes etc.) need to be solved first. These equations are more less self explanatory, but cannot be solved for the entire exhaust at once except for the very simple cases, which this obviously is not, because we are talking here about Farrari.
So, in order to get numerical solution describing fluid flow in a domain, the domain must be split into smaller sub domains called cells or elements and equations are solved for each of these cells. Collection of these cells in a region is called Mesh or Grid and the process of splitting the domain into cells is called mesh generation. Grid generation is an essential tool in computational simulation of physical field phenomena and process. Unfortunately, grid generation process is not unique, of course; it can be seen something which involves art, lunacy as well as science. Therefore, it requires intensive user interaction in selection and development of high quality reliable grid. Automation of grid generation process requires understanding of the underlying principles, mathematics and technology involved in the process and a careful analysis of problem domain. In 2D case domain is split into quadrilaterals and triangular cells and for 3D case in hexahedral and tetrahedral cells.
 
P
If your car is equipped with this engine
Untitled1.png

then yes, louder exhaust making a lot of noise like this
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

will increase the fuel consumption.
If your car has under the bonnet (sorry I forgot it was Farrari) engine which looks like this:
ferrari-engine_100232737_l.jpg

then, no, it won't increase the fuel consumption.

You P*ss taker you :D
 
Without knowing exactly which Fararri engine you have, it is difficult to answer accurately.

If you fit 27 monastically spaced neodymium injectors around the bellhousing, arranged to feed the downstream turbine exhaust vents with a mixture of high 'S' value phenol hydrobenzamine and a 5% concentrate of remonitorive tetra-ioda hexamine. This should offset any possibility of increased fuel consumption. Remember though, that both liquids have specific periscosities, given by the formula P = 2.5C x 6.7 / N where N is the di-ethical evolute of retrograde temperature phase disposition and C is the shelmondolaze angular grid coefficient. If you set things up with a Signature series Schottky auto-calibrating hopper datascope to measure the exact quantities, it should be fine.

It is important that the exhaust does not intermesh with the regurgative purlwell and the super-native weanel sprocket. Adjust the Lotuso-deltoid windings if that is the case, alternatively, use a series of offset 3Kilohertz anhydrous nangling pins to enable a cryptonaptic bowling shim to be tankered at the inlet manifold.

You can work out the Bernoulli constant for calculation of Neutrino flow stack requirements: Nodal value = Quantative hydraxis squared / Trignometrical amplitude times Pi. This will let you configure your Multiplexed, Torroidal stream Cadmium coated concentric tambur shafts to match the Tambourelli bevelled gearsets.

Hope this helps.
All of the above can be avoided if a Kenwood Flux capacitor is fitted to the Furryarri engine.
 
Exhaust or for that matter intake changes impacting on engine performance and therefore fuel economy stem from the days when fuelling was open loop. A loud exhaust with less back pressure weakened the mixture so unless the mixture was corrected, more noise could mean less power. Even in modern cars where mixture correction is closed loop and automatic, both intakes and exhausts can be tuned to take advantage of reflected pressure waves. Changes that interfere with the manufacturers original intent are very unlikely to be an improvement or if they are in a certain rev range it will be to the detriment at some other revs.
190. You are taking this way too seriously. Nobody cares..we are Pi55 take mode.:cool::cool:
 
To analyze exhaust gases flow in an area of interest, the partial differential equations (Euler equations, Navier-Stokes etc.) need to be solved first. These equations are more less self explanatory, but cannot be solved for the entire exhaust at once except for the very simple cases, which this obviously is not, because we are talking here about Farrari.
So, in order to get numerical solution describing fluid flow in a domain, the domain must be split into smaller sub domains called cells or elements and equations are solved for each of these cells. Collection of these cells in a region is called Mesh or Grid and the process of splitting the domain into cells is called mesh generation. Grid generation is an essential tool in computational simulation of physical field phenomena and process. Unfortunately, grid generation process is not unique, of course; it can be seen something which involves art, lunacy as well as science. Therefore, it requires intensive user interaction in selection and development of high quality reliable grid. Automation of grid generation process requires understanding of the underlying principles, mathematics and technology involved in the process and a careful analysis of problem domain. In 2D case domain is split into quadrilaterals and triangular cells and for 3D case in hexahedral and tetrahedral cells.
You, my friend have way , way too much time on your hands right now :banana:
 
Ok if you have a freeer flowing intake and exhaust you will use more fuel as your engine can breathe better, but then it would depend on the ecu, some are clever enough to advance/retard timing, add/remove fuel when neccesary to a point if it goes beyond its capabilities or not a clever enough ecu this is where you will run into problems causing cracks of det or running lean and neither of these 2 things are particularly good for an engine at all, it could destroy it. Another thing that could come about in turboed cars is an overboost which is not good for an engine either
 
I wonder if the OP will ever make it to post number 2...
 
Big/loud exhaust doest it affect fuel consumption?

Only if you have a big/loud right foot to go with it.
 
The confusion is because people are saying "Make more noise". You're not making more noise. You're simply not muffling as much of it.

Oldbarrack, the OP probably is a bot/spammer. Posed what seems like a genuine question, that'll later have relevant seeming links posted to it in the hope the spam tactics will slide under the radar. Could be wrong though.

Yes, thanks the heads up MancMike - as I typed, that slowly dawned on me; hence my closing remark:

LOL - I'm probably speaking to a bot ... :D

Some of the interim replies, as we all realised it wasn't serious, got progressively funnier though; so at lease we got some entertainment value!!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom