• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

C43 vs c32

D

Deleted member 37751

Guest
I've had the C43 a fortnight now (and the C32 four month!) so I thought I'd write down a bit of an insight into the ownership of these two great cars.

C32:

As most of you know, this has been a labour of love project, it's certainly cost me a fair bit more than I'd anticipated, but such is life...Anyway...

There are a few noticeable differences in the nature of these cars; the '32 loves to rev, it just loves to pull and pull all the way through the revs. It also feels lighter, I'm not entirely sure why, obviously I'd expect the engine to be lighter due to this 'only' having six cylinders and a supercharger, but it certainly feels more sprightly. It seems to have a very similar soul to the C36 that I owned, and I think that a six cylinder suits the C-Class more than an eight.

Because of its relatively quiet Q-Car nature, it's not too hard to be into treble digits without noticing, the C32 just wants to keep going and goin from the first rev to the last.

The interior feels as though it wraps around you and the buttons on the dash seem to be closer to the fingertip, although in the W202's defence, the interior does seem to be chiselled out of a block of granite...

0-60mph and 40-80mph this car simply loves, once you are in tune with the 'box, you will find that you look end up taking the long route to your destination; it took me two hours to nip for some bread and milk the other day...

C43:

I think the fact that this is my second C43 says a lot really, a V8 shouldn't really be in a car of this size but it is and it's wonderful.

After stepping out of the C32 and straight into the C43, my first impressions are how lazier the W202 is; if the car didn't have a de-cat, you could just happily waft about with hardly anyone casting a glance in your direction, such is the relaxed nature of the beast. If you don't like the sound of this engine at full chat, you need to be on the Prius forum because the car makes such a wonderful cacophony that immediately brings a smile to your face and it is a sound that I never bore of.

Whereas in my C36 it was crying out for a manual 'box (and the C32 to an extent), this five speed auto suits the car completely and utterly; you can be mooching along at 40ish, drop it into second gear, into third at 60 and then just sit back and enjoy the ride...

The interior is feeling a little dated now, but I think it's on the cusp of being 'retro' so that isn't a big concern really to be fair; there was a massive design change between the W202 and W203 that I think you prefer one or the other and not necessarily both.

To summarise

If you are contemplating buying a sub £5k car as a weekend toy, you can't go wrong with either; the C43 would be 'cheaper' to own because there is less to go wrong, but on the other hand the C32 is a lot faster and a lot more tuneable; it's not much of a stretch to get the C32 past 400bhp, whereas your options are really limited with the C43.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
New to the marque, so this took me off to a interesting 'tuners' journey around Google.
Thanks for posting!
Steve.
 
Great little comparison -

Where do you park all these wagons :lol: - Note slight rear derrière of RR in background ;)
 
Where do you park all these wagons :lol: - Note slight rear derrière of RR in background ;)

I've had to buy next door so I have more space to park!

And yes, that is my RRS skulking in the background...
 
So ultimately, which do you prefer? The C43?
 
So ultimately, which do you prefer? The C43?

They are such different beasts that I can't really have a particular favourite.

In a nutshell; the C32 is ferociously fast but the sound of the C43 is to die for...
 
SPX said:
They are such different beasts that I can't really have a particular favourite.

In a nutshell; the C32 is ferociously fast but the sound of the C43 is to die for...

If you HAD to choose one ?
 
Not totally the same, but I've driven both 202s and 203s and if I'm really honest, I'd choose the 202 as it seemed to be better built, more solid, albeit clearly an earlier generation car ergonomically. My own 203 "sport coupe" was a very poorly built car and suffered a lot of irritating issues whereas a friends C230 202 had no real issues in 10 years of ownership!

But I'd love to know how the two different AMGs compare... :D
 
Looked at this and there is some data out there;- swithced from and E46 M3 ultimatly went for the C32, deceptivly fast but no fuss, slightly less costly (Cheaper);- Loving it ATM
 
I'd take a tidy W202 C43 over an average W203 C32 anyday.

C32s although very quick seem a bit soulless to me. Aside from gearbox issues I reckon C43s are very well built cars too :cool:

Build quality seems better overall and less headaches with a W202 than an early W203.

How about a later W203 C55 Lee - surely right up your street? :)
 
I'd take a tidy W202 C43 over an average W203 C32 anyday.

C32s although very quick seem a bit soulless to me. Aside from gearbox issues I reckon C43s are very well built cars too :cool:

Build quality seems better overall and less headaches with a W202 than an early W203.

I would probably agree that the W202 feels better built compared to a W203, but the 202 is now circa 20 year old and was originally designed when the purse strings a were little looser than with the 203.

I'm not terribly nostalgic about the Mercedes of old when it comes to owning one; I absolutely love the look of a Pagoda but to drive they are not very nice when compared to its younger cousins and that's not a dig, it's just a fact; the W123 that I bought was a very special car but in reality it was pretty slow and floaty.

Having said that, not everyone thinks the same as me and I'm sure there are plenty of people out there that are more than happy with their old Mercedes.

With regards speed, the C43 isn't in the same league I'm afraid; the C32 just pulls all the way through the rev range like it's possessed and I intend to test them side-by-side to see what the actual results of a race are; the '32 feels at least a second quicker to 60. A lot of that may be down to how the power is delivered, the 203 is like a rabid dog straining at its leash and you can only drive it one of two ways; really slow or really quick. The 202 on the other hand is a lot more genteel in its road manner, you definitely get a sense of the Mercedes of a bygone era when tootling around in that. The 203 certainly feels sharper if you try and throw it about.

How about a later W203 C55 Lee - surely right up your street? :)
I'd have to agree wholeheartedly with you there Will, I probably prefer the lazier nature of a N/A V8 as opposed to a supercharged V6, so I dare say that when these two go a W203 C55 (estate if I can find one) will be top of the list.
 
I would probably agree that the W202 feels better built compared to a W203, but the 202 is now circa 20 year old and was originally designed when the purse strings a were little looser than with the 203.

I'm not terribly nostalgic about the Mercedes of old when it comes to owning one; I absolutely love the look of a Pagoda but to drive they are not very nice when compared to its younger cousins and that's not a dig, it's just a fact; the W123 that I bought was a very special car but in reality it was pretty slow and floaty.

Having said that, not everyone thinks the same as me and I'm sure there are plenty of people out there that are more than happy with their old Mercedes.

With regards speed, the C43 isn't in the same league I'm afraid; the C32 just pulls all the way through the rev range like it's possessed and I intend to test them side-by-side to see what the actual results of a race are; the '32 feels at least a second quicker to 60. A lot of that may be down to how the power is delivered, the 203 is like a rabid dog straining at its leash and you can only drive it one of two ways; really slow or really quick. The 202 on the other hand is a lot more genteel in its road manner, you definitely get a sense of the Mercedes of a bygone era when tootling around in that. The 203 certainly feels sharper if you try and throw it about.


I'd have to agree wholeheartedly with you there Will, I probably prefer the lazier nature of a N/A V8 as opposed to a supercharged V6, so I dare say that when these two go a W203 C55 (estate if I can find one) will be top of the list.
I'd definitely say that the W202 C43 was better built and not just down to feel - less electrical headaches, better fit and finish and tough mechanically.

Sure the C32 is quicker, but carry out the 5.4 conversion you've been longing for on your W202 and that should just about sort things out I would think :cool:

V8 sounds better too! :rock:
 
My C32 accelerated like Concorde.

Unfortunately it didn't sound good, a whistle when the supercharger kicked in and that rather dull Mercedes V6 note.

I'd have a lazy old V8 any day.
 
I'd definitely say that the W202 C43 was better built and not just down to feel - less electrical headaches, better fit and finish and tough mechanically.

I certainly think that the W202 AMG's will become very fashionable in a year or two, maybe even more so when the tree huggers finally manage to make sure that every new car runs on cow dung...
 
I have only owned C43s since 2003 - 10 years of 1 model! Cannot beat the v8 sound, esp. with olly's decat!

"If you don't like the sound of this engine at full chat, you need to be on the Prius forum" <<< LOL
 
Took my c43 out of storage today and after a little drive 70 euro worth of fuel I have to say I'm off to bed a happy man enjoyed every minute

I even had a guy in a m3 walk up to me in the petrol station and say I love the car and walk on

Nice to see the c43 is working tight today she made me grin a few times

It's the v8 sound
 
i'd pick the c43 over c32.
w203 looks doesn't do it for me.
 
C43 all the way
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom