It varies from company to company. 12 years and 15 years are quite common.
I looked into it for my SL but a 'normal' policy worked out cheaper, and of course earns NCD (which a classic one generally doesn't). I think the difference nowadays is that you can specify pretty low annual mileages with mainstream insurers.
The main advantage of a classic policy though is normally an agreed value for the car.
Thanks, I was wondering if the wifes 2004 Z4 was better on a classic policy for next time (I thought the threshold may be 10 years). It only does about 1000 - 1500 miles a year so, apart from the fact that she loves it, I'm starting to wonder whether its justifying its garage room. Keeping its running costs to a minimum would help that process. Have to wait a little while yet.
It's still worth phoning round - there may be companies that start at 10 years. But for a Z4 I'd have thought you'd be better off with a normal policy with the mileage limit set low. You definitely need to shop around though - I had a variation of approx. £1k when I got new quotes for my SL last year!
They offer classic insurance for some MB models at five years and older. My CLK55 has been insured with them on a classic policy since I bought it at seven years old
C217 S63 AMG Coupe - Triumph Tiger 1200 Rally Explorer
The only issue with a classic policy is that you don't accrue NCB. That said most companies offer 10% per year if you haven't claimed and return to a normal policy.
The only issue with a classic policy is that you don't accrue NCB. That said most companies offer 10% per year if you haven't claimed and return to a normal policy.
This is true, but in my case it worked out cheaper to run a second vehicle maintaining and increasing my NCD for the savings made by insuring the AMG on classic. When I bought the CLK55, the difference between classic and standard policies was about £700 - even including the cost of RFL, MoT test and a year's insurance on my estate car it works out cheaper and I get a useful additional car to use for free