D
That must have been some remap...
- Thread starter Deleted member 37751
- Start date
-
- Tags
- remap
Scott_F
MB Enthusiast
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2010
- Messages
- 4,194
The pictures certainly do "speak for them self".
"What the fcuk are they yellin' ?
'Gangsta ! Gangsta !' "
"What the fcuk are they yellin' ?
'Gangsta ! Gangsta !' "
ash59fifty-uk
MB Enthusiast
SPX said:
I thought the remap on those took it to near 700?
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2007
- Messages
- 8,231
- Car
- Volvo XC90 T8 Polestar c500bhp
It's a 6.3L (ho ho) - 525hp M156 - mapped, perhaps 550hp ish.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
- Messages
- 7,540
- Car
- AUDI S8 V10, S210 E320 CDI (R.I.P.)
And to think daveenty wasted all that money on lots of fancy parts to get his gains. In reality, he just needed a stage 2 from whoever did this one.
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2008
- Messages
- 19,499
- Location
- Bournemouth/Poole Dorset
- Car
- W210 E280 x2, w211 E55, W212 E63 biturbo, S204 C180K
The problem with quoting it has 620bhp is everyone who has an interest in these cars knows a 6.2 wont make anywhere near that figure with just a map.
He is going to look silly when an enthusiast turns up and asks for proof, then tells him its 100bhp over estimated.
Aside from that, it looks OK to me and a cheap way of getting into a W212 E63.
He is going to look silly when an enthusiast turns up and asks for proof, then tells him its 100bhp over estimated.
Aside from that, it looks OK to me and a cheap way of getting into a W212 E63.
ash59fifty-uk
MB Enthusiast
developer said:
I was close
Does look a nice example though
