It is a highly reputable interdependent dealership that offer 12months warranty 12montjs MOT and breakdown after purchase. But basically they hasn't serviced themselves the car was bought by them around Feb/March 2020 and I purchased the vehicle at the start of November 2020, they stated it had been advertised as Full service history as all services were carried out at MB. I've attached the photo below of the last 2 services, all other ones were at MB aswel. According to them the last one was only a service A therefore only oil and dust were required. But according to MB Glasgow they should of done the ATF and plugs aswel. A B service was carried out in 2019 but that's too soon for a ATF or spark plugs as mileage was low.
Basically, how can I argue this? With MB Glasgow to include it in my service plan or the dealership I bought it from?
Really appreciate the assistance guys! Thank you!
Unfortunately I don't believe that the onus is on MB Glasgow or the operators of the service care plan, as they are in no way responsible for the situation arising.
It could be that MB Sandown failed to make the owner aware that there were additional items due, but the likelihood of that is tiny - dealers love spark plug and transmission fluid changes as they're expensive - so I don't think they're culpable either.
Most likely is that the previous owner said "How much!?!?" when quoted, and said "just do the service, and not the expensive additional items" because they were probably part-exing. Probably the cause but you have no come back on them.
So the only remaining party is the seller. You could ask Trading Standards or Citizens Advice Bureau for advice, but I would be very surprised if you got anywhere with it.
You could go after the seller for false advertising but they could reasonably claim that it was an honest mistake because the car had been serviced. Legal proceedings are based upon reasonableness, and I think that argument would probably be seen as reasonable.
So I think you have the following options starting from least cost and shortest ownership, to most cost and longest ownership:
1. Accept that they've been missed, don't even service it, and sell now or very soon.
2. Accept that they've been missed, service it, and sell now or very soon.
3. Accept that they've been missed, just do what's due now, as it's unlikely that it will cause an issue in your ownership.
4. Accept that they've been missed, do spark plugs now, and save diff and transmission for a later date.
5. Accept that they've been missed, do spark plugs, diff and transmission now.
If you go for option 4, then I would go for spark plugs first as they can be a blighter to remove if they're left in situ too long!
Finally, skipping the transmission service and spark plug change is commonplace, especially because on other models they're due in year 4 or year 5, at which point many cars are outside of the main dealer network - usually triggered by the cost of those additional items.
You can imagine the scenario:
Owner: "Can you give me a price for my next service please?"
Main dealer: "Yes Sir/Madam, we can provide a car or you can wait, and that'll be £1,194".
Owner: "How much? I thought it was expensive last year at £340. I'll leave it thanks".
Owner: "Can you give me a price for my next service please?"
Independent garage: "Yes Sir/Madam, you'll have to leave it with us, but we can do it for £300"
Owner: "Brilliant. That's even less than last year. Does that include everything Mercedes include?"
Independent garage: "We follow our own schedule which includes the common checks for cars of all makes"
Owner: "That'll do for me"
Of course there are variations on that theme, including having all the same work done outside of the dealer network, but for less cost. Unfortunately many people aren't even slightly interested, and to be fair their cars keep running. Usually.