Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is exactly what the LA want. They’re so desperate for your money.There's a thread on here somewhere.
Next time I will just pay the £60, not worth the agro.
I've fought and won a few parking issues, against both private and LA tickets. It's been more a matter of principle than the cost of the fine. I like to think that I'm always careful about where I park, so being told that I've got it wrong is like a red rag to a bull. In none of the incidents has there been any necessity to go to tribunal/court, I just make sure that I start with a well prepared case and make my initial approach friendly. The majority were resolved in my favour after the first contact.This is exactly what the LA want. They’re so desperate for your money.
For them & the private parking firms it's a numbers game. They know a high % of the ticketed will say "It's only £x amount, I can't be bothered to fight it" & will cough up. Those who do fight have a high win rate.
Using the helpful experts at Pepipoo (now Free Traffic Legal Advice - Index ) I have received & beaten 6 parking tickets in the last 15 or so years & lost none. In the judgement of the last successful appeal, Merton parking enforcement had a new ****hole installed courtesy of the adjudicator outraged at their sloppy handling of the matter. Very satisfying.
My advice is to fight them every time.
Interesting about Porsche not making any approaches.I've fought and won a few parking issues, against both private and LA tickets. It's been more a matter of principle than the cost of the fine. I like to think that I'm always careful about where I park, so being told that I've got it wrong is like a red rag to a bull. In none of the incidents has there been any necessity to go to tribunal/court, I just make sure that I start with a well prepared case and make my initial approach friendly. The majority were resolved in my favour after the first contact.
Being tenacious helps. I've not had to test my tenacity with any parking challenges, but have found it successful against a major flag carrier airline and our very own Home Office. In the latter instance, it did end up in court where I ALMOST felt sorry for the tongue lashing dealt out to the Home Office solicitor at the conclusion.
My only failure has been with Mercedes-Benz Group AG. They objected to my last company's use of their three-pointed star in our marketing. It's a very well protected trademark and during our communications with their legal department in Germany they made it very clear that their defence would be unbreakable! Discretion and hands up in defeat became a very much better part of valour. (BMW and Porsche, the other two companies whose logos we used extensively, never made any approaches. Perhaps they didn't regard us as competitors ) Quality Used Prestige, Sports and Performance Cars for Sale in Yateley, Hampshire | Lodge Motor Company Limited
Trademarks are massive cans of worms. For instance, here's an extract from Porsche's legal page:On the subject of Porsche being picky over their trademarks, there's a firm called Hex Innovate who created a diagnostic tool for BMW motorcycles that they called the HEX GS-911. The GS bit relates to a particular model line of BMW motorcycles, while the 911 bit relates to the emergency telephone number on the USA. So no problem with any of that, right? Wrong.
Porsche legal contacted them because - would you believe - 911 is one of their trademarks when it relates to the automotive sector.
Eventually, Porsche consented to use of the three digits by Hex Innovate, as long as they only refer to the product in speech as the GS nine-one-one, and never the GS nine-eleven.
They’re not turning. It turned years ago.TfL’s income from fining drivers on major roads jumps 57% in five years
The AA has accused the transport authority of ensuring London’s streets are ‘paved with fines’.www.standard.co.uk
TfL may need drivers to offend and generate income instead of complying with road rules
Jack Cousens, AA
Mr Cousens said the increase in the amount of income English councils outside London are receiving from bus lane enforcement – from £46.8 million in 2022/23 to £54 million in the following 12 months – demonstrates authorities nationwide are “turning road traffic enforcement into an indispensable income stream”.
Same as the ULEZ.The obvious idiocy here is that an enforcement system that generates little or no income actually works as intended because it is an effective deterrent preventing drives from offending, while a system that raises cash is in fact ineffective because it's punitive after the did was done rather than preventative in nature.
They'd be screwed if we all complied.
Good news, common sense prevailed.All's well that ends well.... I am happy to report that following the second appeal the Council cancelled the PCN. I asked them to reconsider and to exercise their discretion, and this seems to have worked. Thank you all for your comments.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.