My YouTube short with more details:
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks good - shame it hasn't got the ponton flare of the 212 though, i think that really sets it apart from BMW, Audi etc and is a nice nod to history.That's very nice.
I heard last estate, full stop.....killed off by the SUV fad.Handsome. Said to be the last E class estate?
Based on those pics alone.....I think thats a rather better looking car than the 213 version....more "edges".....less of the sagging, slightly melted look that hopefully is a fashion that's passing. Reminds me more of the 212 than the 213. Not sure about the Mercedes star rear lights....but overall?...like it.
We’re not really though are we? V8’s are no longer needed/required/essential (one could argue that they never were).We are going backwards fast.
I certainly wouldn’t want to go back to the pure box shape of car of old. Aerodynamics of a London bus. Sure there were more space in old estates. My dads mate had a mahoooosive Volvo estate that would fit a wardrobe inside. But seeing those cars now? Look more like a van.I used to get quite a few wine/spirits bottles under the rear facing seats in the s124. And the spare wheel in the wing and the spaces next to the radio aerial and first aid kit had lots of useful hidey hole spaces too. Now there is so little space that almost nothing fits in. I once got two single beds in the back of the s124 and got them into Russia without paying bribes or customs fees... by holding up the entire border queue for 30 minutes while the customs boss made up his mind to let me through. Happy days.
We’re not really though are we? V8’s are no longer needed/required/essential (one could argue that they never were).
My ole dad loved his Fax machine but soon moved on. Move with the times. Embrace the change. Don’t look back, look forward.
Old man shouting at the clouds? . Not at all. I love your detailed reply. Thank you.I'm a big fan of V8's. For their size and weight they put out a lot of power and torque very smoothly and very reliably. One of their best attributes is their simplicity, especially if they are n/a. I've had one continuously now for 20 years and have had a tiny number of mechanical problems - namely one crank pulley and one oil leak. For someone who doesn't do a lot of miles they are brilliant things.
I talk about cars a lot with the folks that fix them for me and they all wince at the complexity and declining quality of more recent cars. My current one is from 2010 and so pre-dates the drive for more economy which very often (according to them) often involves trying to make things lighter which often involved substituting plastic assemblies for metal ones and which are therefore more likely to fail. Also, if I were to have the current equivalent of my car's engine it would be smaller and would have two turbos to make up for the loss of displacement. I know what I'd prefer in a 13 year old car - I'll stick with my two extra piston, thankyou. Far less likely to go bang and generate huge bills.
Them you get into the electronics. My wife's car has electric power steering (because mpg's) which failed at 7 years/20k miles. Not wanting to get absolutely rinsed at Fiat (£1k + labour) I went down the specialist route. Three specialists later and a lot of grief I got it fixed for half the cost but it was a right ball ache. In years gone by, that car would have had hydraulic power steering and none of this would have happened. To put this into context, I've had cars with PAS since 1990 and this is the first failure.
That's what I mean by "going backwards". The chase for fuel economy has removed simplicity and/or quality. We're going to end up with cars that may be 20 or 30% better on fuel but which will get scrapped sooner when some sub system fails at catastrophic cost. Which isn't very green if you ask me.
Anyway, I feel like an old man shouting at the clouds. No doubt whatever I get next will have a turbo (or two) and I'll just have to suck it up. I was very happy to get away from those particular automotive grenades when I stepped out of my second 200SX and into my first C43. But, hey ho, that's "progress".
I totally agree with your long reply. To clarify though, the massive complexity of car engines of the past 10 years is to bring down CO2 for the accreditation test. However, you only need to look at the honest John real MPG site to see that MPG hasn't really improved at all. But what has been lost, as you say, is reliability, because all these extra systems to keep CO2 low mean greater chance of one of them failing. I also have a V8, and I just did the MPG calculation for a very long very fast drive from the southwest to the northeast, and it did 25.1 according to my brim to brim fill... I had a Mercedes w203 270 CDI that used to do low to mid 30s MPG. So not bad! We seem to be in a period when ICE cars are becoming worse by the year, and electric cars are becoming better by the year. But at the moment they're both unsatisfactory. But in 10 years there is only going to be better and better electric cars, and ice cars up until the early 2000s will probably be reasonably well valued, but ones after that not so because of the reliability of all the extra CO2 gubbins on board. That's my prediction anywayThat's what I mean by "going backwards". The chase for fuel economy has removed simplicity and/or quality. We're going to end up with cars that may be 20 or 30% better on fuel but which will get scrapped sooner when some sub system fails at catastrophic cost. Which isn't very green if you ask me.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.