• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

Diesel man

Status
Not open for further replies.
developer said:
So that's anyone with less than 450bhp banned then :D.
Click to expand...

[worried mode on]
Is it combined, per vehicle??
[/worried mode off]

Oh wait, I sometimes drive lorry, one of them has that on the spec sheet

Engine output:375 kW (510 hp) / R 6 / 2500 Nm at 1100 rpm

Bhp qualifies, and the torque, well - that wipes the floor with your wannabe powerful engines.

Ahh, feeling smug now :cool:
 
I had a bit of a run in with DM in my early days here, but soon learnt to take his unwarranted rants with a very large pinch of salt. I find it's best to ignore him on those occasions, then he quietly slips away (usually!). In this instance it appeared that he responded aggressively (but not IMO overtly so) to an attack on his all too common direct complaint: "lack of facts so why bother discussing it." I didn't think his response was significantly worse than the post from the person to which it was directed, but that's not my call. I'm sure he'll accept his "punishment" with the same shrug I accepted mine when I made the mistake of criticising the disgustingly foul-mouthed abuse hurled by another member who I can only assume was a friend of a moderator!

[Presenting wrists for handcuffs]
 
RWDpetrol said:
I don't understand the policy of banning, what happened to free speech? Even if his comments are (hypothetically speaking) directly insulting, so what....that's a risk you take in life whenever you interact with another person. Grow up and deal with it.
Click to expand...

Sorry, but please do point out to me where in British legislation there is ANY mention of free speech or freedom of speech?

That's an American concept to my knowledge, and something that they fought (us) to obtain...

m.
 
knighterrant said:
I had a bit of a run in with DM in my early days here, but soon learnt to take his unwarranted rants with a very large pinch of salt. I find it's best to ignore him on those occasions, then he quietly slips away (usually!). In this instance it appeared that he responded aggressively (but not IMO overtly so) to an attack on his all too common direct complaint: "lack of facts so why bother discussing it." I didn't think his response was significantly worse than the post from the person to which it was directed, but that's not my call. I'm sure he'll accept his "punishment" with the same shrug I accepted mine when I made the mistake of criticising the disgustingly foul-mouthed abuse hurled by another member who I can only assume was a friend of a moderator!

[Presenting wrists for handcuffs]
Click to expand...

My memory of that was you got the absolute wrong end of the stick and ranted on about something that, although the same 'name' was used, had two completely different connotations.
 
I know and so dose ever one else ...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

F
Diesel leak smell
Replies
1
Views
135
OneForTheRoad
OneForTheRoad
Harrythedog
Who’s going to win this argument?
Replies
8
Views
609
Gollom
Gollom
D
S400Lh Saloon 3.5 hybrid or 350 cdi w222
Replies
4
Views
264
MikeInWimbledon
MikeInWimbledon
A
MB 508 D
Replies
0
Views
211
ArthurBosman
A
MerrieMike
DPF cleaning additive for 2011 E350 CDI Blue Efficiency
Replies
3
Views
383
MerrieMike
MerrieMike
Back
Top Bottom