• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

Speeding Tickets

Have you been done for speeding

  • Yes

    Votes: 50 67.6%
  • No

    Votes: 24 32.4%

  • Total voters
    74

R2D2

MB Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 23, 2004
Messages
6,957
Car
C350
We constantly read about the increase in speeding tickets being issued but you dont often hear people saying they got one. So how about a simple poll so that people needn't add a named comment.

Question: Have you been done for speeding Yes or No
 
Last edited:
My ticket was approaching the New Severn Bridge Tolls, the speed limit is reduced to 50mph and I was doing 62. On the old bridge, there is no reduction. Apparently it is done because of the weaving of the cars trying to get into the shortest queue and the auto pay bins etc. So if you intend going to South Wales via M4, beware.
 
53 in a 40 in Southampton about 6 years ago got an SP30. Thing is that it happened in my 1.4 Astra (**hangs head in shame** It was the only thing I could get insured on when I was 19 :( ) Cars since then have been significantly more powerful and I have got nothing since....well not yet. Maybe its because I am a law abiding citizen and never speed on the queens highway :crazy:
 
Last edited:
Twice.
In '89, about 01:30 AM. Thought I was in a 40 but it was a 30 limit.
In '90, approaching the QE2 bridge construction, missed the 60 limit size whilst looking at the new bridge. (Cops were having a field day).
 
Ashamed to admit that my license is not good reading :rolleyes: . I must make the effort to get it back to the DVLA to clean it up. Points earned while being a delivery driver years ago, since having a Road Angel I have become more aware of my driving habits and had non since its purchase :bannana:
 
Never had the pleasure.

I've held a clean licence for 27 years but I have been pulled over twice and given a friendly warning for driving too fast.

Once about 2 months ago and once way back when I came off the M62 and didn't slow down on the dual carriageway. I'll never forget laughing when the policeman said "Are we having difficulty leaving the runway Captain" I was so sure I was getting a ticket but all I got was a mind how you go.


Gatsos cant do that
 
Two incidents but only one ticket.

1993 2.00am on the A3, car kept driving very close, backing off and then running up to tailgate again. Booted away for fear of lunatic but this turned out to be two bored Surrey Police morons (and I use that term correctly) in traffic car trying to get a pull. Lodged formal complaint to Chief Constable, PCA, MP etc. Legal process kept going because to back off would have meant admitting wrongdoing by officers concerned and case only dropped when I turned up in court with brief in tow.

Letter of non-apology & settlement with all legal costs recovered four years later. Am I still angry about that twelve years later? Oh yes.

January 2003 38mph in 30 limit. Obviously I had not been paying attention.

I should have known from the density of the trees on both sides of the now dead straight, house and junction free A road on the way out of a village that I was still in a 30 limit for, ooooh, another 50 yards or so. Very cynical piece of revenue raising by the Berkshire Camera Partnership

And I am still angry about that as well. :mad:
 
Satch said:
1993 2.00am on the A3, car kept driving very close, backing off and then running up to tailgate again. Booted away for fear of lunatic but this turned out to be two bored Surrey Police morons (and I use that term correctly) in traffic car trying to get a pull. Lodged formal complaint to Chief Constable, PCA, MP etc. Legal process kept going because to back off would have meant admitting wrongdoing by officers concerned and case only dropped when I turned up in court with brief in tow.


Have heard about this sort of thing a few times on the motorway, Takes the p#@s :eek:
 
its a technology jungle out there.

Just wait a minute till I get up on my soap box. :( :( Yes I,m afraid I've been done 3 times by the boys in blue. Twice on what I felt were technicalities and a warning would have sufficed. Once I will hold up my hands to. I was in a hurry to get somewhere. :o :o On reflection I felt that in many ways the odds are stacked against the motorist. Often the newspapers interview the local traffic officers as part of safety campaign and they are proud to demonstrate the £100k+ equipment in their traffic car to "catch" the aberrant motorist. What has the average motorist got in his car to help keep him "legal" a speedo costing a fiver!!! It seems to me that in the technology war the driver is well "outgunned" if you excuse the pun. OK there is a bit of a motorist's guerrilla fight back with radar detectors and GPS camera locators and the manufacturers have given some of us cruise control but the technology is still heavily weighted against the driver. Interestingly a recent survey showed that the Advisory Displays that flash to warn you to slow down and display your speed are far more effective in lowering average road speeds than speed cameras. The salutory fact is that if you are flashed by a speed camera you have ALREADY broken the law so it has failed as a deterrent. It has failed mainly because in many cases people have simply forgotton to keep their speed down or are unaware of the presence of the cameras and thus are "trapped". The very name implies a form of deception.
The difference in approach as I see it is that we should be developing systems to HELP drivers drive safely, be MORE AWARE of hazards to themselves and to others rather than spending money on ever more sophisticated means to catch them. Who knows it might reduce the terrible toll of death and injury more effectively because thats what the technology is for isn't it??? I'l get down of the soapbox now. :) :)
 
20:9 so 2/3rds of members have been done for speeding...........
 
It is quite simply a money making thing or it would be simple as I said in another post

ie. 20 limit out side of school if caught doing 40

1week ban +£1k fine . If you new that was the penalty how many of you would take the risk? I know I wouldnt for sure.

The thing is the ods on getting caught and the penalty are generally a risk we are prepared to take.
 
Some good points there grober.

Would the answer be HIGHER limits ? Do people exceed limits because they feel too restrained ?

Although German autobahns don't have limits, I'm sure everybody doesn't drive flat out all the time when using them.
What is the average speed on autobahns ?

If the UK motorway limit was raised to say 100mph, I don't think EVERYONE would be driving 30mph faster. I suspect many people are confortable at 85mph and would not driver much faster.

I would happier if lots of Gatso/Tuvelo were replaced with ANPR cameras.
 
Last edited:
The displays that flash to warn you to slow down and display your speed have been in my area for a while. They are battery operated and get moved from place to place. Fine so far: a useful reminder to slow down, BUT:

Hugely inaccurate and seem to deafult to lower limit of 31mph. Road Angel tells me 26 mph: 31 on sign. 30mph: 36 on sign. Net result is that everybody ignores them and standard Barry Boy game is to see how high you can get the sign to go from the time it has first picked you up until you pass it!

Batteries die after a few days and the things sits there dead as door knobs until it is time to move them to the next location.

A reasonable idea once again badly implimented
 
Not only the speed camera revenue but think of the extra profit this is generating the insurance companies in extra premiums. :crazy:
 
grober said:
The difference in approach as I see it is that we should be developing systems to HELP drivers drive safely, be MORE AWARE of hazards to themselves and to others...

Try RoSPA. Telephone 0121 248 2000. You'll be surprised at what you don't have to spend, and how enjoyable it is.
 
Agree with many of the points on here - especially PJH's points about everyone not exceeding a 100mph limit by such a margin.

I have been incredibly lucky thus far to never get a speeding ticket (by my own admission, one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in recent years, although I have had a few 'discussions' with the boys in blue who IMHO have handled the situations very well - once got an almighty b*ll*cking by the side of the road when I was 17, along with a couple of friendly chats in later years!) so I do not have an axe to grind in this respect, but I do think that the majority of motorists would like to drive to what they feel the corrects limits for themselves and their car would be.

There will always be some nutter who wants to break the sound barrier whilst swerving across 3 lanes of busy traffic, and I guess many of us have at one point or another gone a fair old bit over the limit (<insert your own number here>!) on rare occasions we deem as safe to do so, however even if there was no limit I would personally not drive at 120mph plus on regular occasions. The reality is that higher speeds are more tiring to drive at, fuel economy can take a serious tumble, and the world does start moving a bit quicker when these higher speeds are reached (slight bends or bumps in the road become somewhat more noticeable at 140mph!). I also agree that schools and residential areas should have low limits that are adherred to (would be nice if common sense was enough to make this happen without enforcement), since this kind of road is far less predictable and the potential for something bad to happen is much higher (as all the stats, for what they're worth, also state).

Even without a limit, I'd probably tend to do 90-100mph on the way home up the M40 on a sunny day (exactly like a lot of the traffic does now!) - some days I'd go slower because it is a more relaxing way to drive. On the way to work I'd probably do exactly the same speed as I do now, because the sheer weight of traffic controls the speeds, not imposed limits. Speeding tickets seem to be enforced as a way of generating revenue (nothing new here!) under the banner of saving us from ourselves - my opinion is that driving is not without risk, therefore we will sadly never get to the point where there are no road accident related deaths. However, I would much rather that the authorities attempted to save peoples lives by targeting those driving dangerously (driving too close, stupid overtaking, ducking in and out of lanes on the motorways just to gain a 1 car advantage, etc, etc) since I genuinely think this would make far more of an impact than going for the easy target of someone doing 85mph on a clear motorway in a car capable of much more than that.

Guess this will always be too tricky and less profitable to police, so whilst there is the easy 'fleece the public' option, I'm not holding my breath for it to improve!!
 
As the day has gone on the ratio has fallen now only 65% of our club has been nicked!
 
R2D2 said:
As the day has gone on the ratio has fallen now only 65% of our club has been nicked!


Arghh, but there was no ption to vote more than once! :o

New poll to see who the persistant repaeat offenders are! LOL
 
6 points ;(

1) 38 in a 30 zone - my fault for not paying attn from the drop from 40. A bit cynical placing however, def not an accident blackspot as they say!

2) w@nkers! was at university, came home to get my car at the time serviced (fiesta zetec s (fun!) ) and got caught by a truvelo that had appeared at some point whilst i was at uni.

nothing for a few years now though. get paroled soon!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom