Dieselman said:
As a matter of interest nano lacquer doesn't require any more finishing/baking than regular acrylic lacquer, but due to being harder but more brittle it doesn't take well to localised repairs as it doesn't sand down to a fine edge, but keeps shaling to a sharp edge.
Okay you win, the bait was cast, the fish has nibbled
All the research I have carried out into nano paint usage by Mercedes-Benz has stated nano paint needs to be baked, and baked at higher temperatures than that required by normal water-based car paints when originally applied.
I was told the reason for the very long delays with getting all models painted in this excellent paint was simply the problem with converting the 'paint line' in the relevant factories to be able to bake at the higher temperatures. I believe the 211 4Matic which is, or was built in Austria is one of the last to have only this paint, the first being the
E, S, CL, SL and SLK-Class model series. I have no idea when the C-class received this paint but would estimate it to be no earlier than the spring of 2004?
Where have you found contradictory literature that explains the Mercedes-Benz nano paint does not require baking?
Just as an aside, an American owner got his newly purchased car replaced when a damaged front wing could not be resprayed with the equivalent paint to the rest of the vehicle. No body repair shop could get hold of genuine nano clear lacquer.
I do accept that times move on, and this paint might now be available, hence this is a question, and not a statement.
During the paint process, the ceramic nano-particles float around freely in the liquid paint. When the car body is baked inside the paint shop oven at 140 degrees Celsius (284 degrees
Fahrenheit), the ceramic nano-particles cross-link into a dense network instead of the long molecular chains found in conventional paint. This allows the lacquer to provide much more effective scratch protection against normal wear and tear.
Regards,
John the curious
nano nano
(Mork and Mindy quote)