Synthetics are not all they are cracked up to be .
ba-dum... tish!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Synthetics are not all they are cracked up to be .
ba-dum... tish!
>>but oil starvation ones are much more common
If you're seriously trying to suggest that lubrication based engine failure is more common than cam belt failure, then, I can do no more than to register my strong disagreement and incredulity.
I never said that I said " The engine failures THAT WE SEE are more commonly caused by lubrication failure and not snapped cam belts" I wasn't talking about engine failure in general as it still amazes me how many people will change a cam belt and not the tensioners and what more garages still do it. With us its a complete cam belt kit or nothing at all, so it doesn't really surprise me if cam belt failure is the most common cause of engine failures.
Satch mentions adverse usage; If there are such criteria, then, if the car meets the critria their stipulations should be followed - yes! - I fully agree with this, it's part and parcel of following the manufacturer's recommended oil change advice.
So, what is the best oil I can use for my:
2002 W210 320 CDI? (141K Miles)
2001 Sprinter 220 CDI? (152K Miles)
Also, where is the best value place to buy from?
Many Thanks.
Paul.
So, what is the best oil I can use for my:
2002 W210 320 CDI? (141K Miles)
2001 Sprinter 220 CDI? (152K Miles)
Also, where is the best value place to buy from?
Many Thanks.
Paul.
Oil threads------- don't ya just love em.
You should read the oil analysis threads on US forums, where it seems to commonplace to regularly send engine oil samples off the the lab.
I think the problem in the states originated when some US MB dealers continued to use older non synthetic engine oil [quaintly termed Dyno-oil] in cars with extended service intervals - the result was a lot of wrecked engines-- and a lot of suspicious customers who blamed the extended service intervals instead of the dealer/oil!Many posters are beyond horrified at extended oil changes as if they're some kind of scam by manufacturers to sell replacement engines!
Interestingly for those frequent changers, analysis shows that new oil causes increased engine wear, then it settles down, then it starts to increase again as mileage increases.
I used to do exactly that - stopped when I got a car with a cat though.I suppose if you were really paranoid about it then with a petrol car you could spin the engine on the starter with the coil disconnected till the oil pressure light extinguished..
I used to do exactly that - stopped when I got a car with a cat though.
does anyone think there is any benefit in changing the oil more frequently than the manufacturer's intervals though? i cannot seem to find any opinions on this.
from my 15yrs experience in a busy workshop, i can confirm that it is possible to do 55,000 miles on the same oil with a 111 engine without loss of performance or using excessive oil. incidentally we see plenty of cars doing in excess of 30,00 miles without oil changes, often only coming in for an annual mot and "it might need a service too" , don't you just love them. also we see plenty of MB petrol and diesel engines over 250,000 miles without excessive oil or fuel consumption, that start very well and sound just fine. my advice to anyone would have to be to have the services done on time, and if it is 20,000 miles after the last one then so be it. to suggest that a modern engine used under typical UK conditions with a suitable 229.5 or 229.3 oil should have intervals shortened is just plain bad advice - misguided and ill informed.
Remind me NEVER to buy a used car from you !!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.