Fastcar155
MB Enthusiast
Hi ,
Thanks for your reply.
You have actually confirmed my thoughts in your reply !
Thanks for your reply.
You have actually confirmed my thoughts in your reply !
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bloody autocorrect.Boy and is *** and DM rolled into one![]()
How do you determine that from a critique of your post?Hi , well you are a great brand ambassador !
MB have been using Renault engines in the smaller diesel variants for quite a while IIRC.Haven't Mercedes partnered with Renault? I could've sworn they are now using the renault 1.2 tce engines in their latest ranges of the CLA and A class etc. CLA180 I believe is the 1.2. I think they could do alright but who knows the future for sure?
Our B class (2015) has a Renault engine! So that has been happening for sometime.....Haven't Mercedes partnered with Renault? I could've sworn they are now using the renault 1.2 tce engines in their latest ranges of the CLA and A class etc. CLA180 I believe is the 1.2. I think they could do alright but who knows the future for sure?
Sharing petrol engine and EV technology too for small cars.MB have been using Renault engines in the smaller diesel variants for quite a while IIRC.
The Koreans seem to have expanded massively their offerings across all drivetrain configurations.. MB are in comparison slow and limited in their offerings and tbh rather unreliable to boot!Those manufacturers most dependent upon low-cost small cars are perhaps the most at risk because they lose their USP with the additional cost of an alternative drive train.
Hyundai/Kia used to be the bargain basement option and developed a good return customer base.The Koreans seem to have expanded massively their offerings across all drivetrain configurations.. MB are in comparison slow and limited in their offerings and tbh rather unreliable to boot!
Hyundai/Kia used to be the bargain basement option and developed a good return customer base.
The cars have got more expensive but the quality, dynamics etc have improved no end.
The warranties are long and very good.
The customer care side of things is very closely monitored and carefully trained.
Ultimately the RRP of the cars has gone up, but it doesn't matter because they are all on PCP and traded before the baloon.
As they have developed the newer more expensive models they have been designed around EV systems.
The average customer of H/K is not interested in badges etc, they don't care about performance and don't often test drive before buying. The absolute most important thing is if their phone pairs and can stream music. They want a trendy looking car, plenty of gimmicks, £300 a month and another nice new one in 3 years for the same.
I rented a Mitsubishi Outlander when I was in Australia a couple of years ago. It was fine and did the job intended without being exciting in any way. One day when driving back to Melbourne we stopped by a remote lake for a short break after a couple of hours. When we got back into the car it wouldn’t start, the battery was flat. Neither of our phones was in decent range of a cell, both cutting out within seconds of connecting to breakdown services. We hadn’t seen any habitation for some time and didn’t fancy just walking off in hope of finding something. After an hour or so a lady stopped to help and phoned for us; a further hour later and we were on our way again. Phew. It was just a one off but didn’t endear me to Mitsubishi.An interesting example in how to get it very wrong is Mitsubishi.
Always an alternative brand for most but a loyal following (a lot like Saab and Bristol drivers in the past)
They offered something quirky and unique.
The launch of the Outlander PHEV was well timed with the tax loophole and was a great hit the ground running moment.
Unfortunately it wasn't a great and as others caught up it was left behind quickly and they ended up with a dull, unrewarding lineup that was way overpriced and some featured some pretty awful common faults and reliability issues.
Not only engines! The third generation A class W176 and derivatives platform was developed in conjunction with Renault.Haven't Mercedes partnered with Renault? I could've sworn they are now using the renault 1.2 tce engines in their latest ranges of the CLA and A class etc. CLA180 I believe is the 1.2. I think they could do alright but who knows the future for sure?
Hi Bobby Dazzler , again thank you for a courteous reply.Unfortunately as on many forums certain members like to throw punches but have glass jaws.I’m not sure what the basis of this thread is. Every business must evolve to survive, especially in a period of faster-than-usual change within it’s environment.
In the last decade Mercedes have reinvented themselves as a cool brand, a high performance brand, a supercar brand, a premium small car brand, and an EV brand.
If I was a car manufacturer executive choosing which car brand to emulate for the next 10 years, then it would be one of the big three from Germany: Volkswagen, Mercedes and BMW.
Those manufacturers most dependent upon low-cost small cars are perhaps the most at risk because they lose their USP with the additional cost of an alternative drive train.
Moreover the bigger risk is that their target market is most likely to be squeezed by the switch to mobility rather than car ownership. Their target market are typically younger and city dwellers.
Those groups are likely to switch to public transport, taxi/Uber, hire cars (both by the hour and the day/week), and maybe even the likes of micro cars and/or scooters for those open to the idea.
Unfortunately as on many forums certain members like to throw punches but have glass jaws.
: for me it is to express ones opinion.
2016 plate car inspected for subframe and brake line corrosion.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.